A prominent topic was the approval of variance application 022 d24, allowing for the construction of a new sign on City Hall Street. The proposed sign, intended to replace an existing one, would exceed the current dimensional standards, standing at 60 square feet and 13 feet tall. Despite the absence of a representative to advocate for the application, the commission found the variance justifiable due to the building’s limited signage space caused by numerous windows and doors. Members agreed that the new sign would not disrupt the locality’s character and emphasized the necessity of visibility for tenants. The approval included recommendations from the staff report.

Another variance application discussed was 023 d24, concerning the construction of a 3,923-square-foot dwelling on Clark Lake Road while retaining an existing non-conforming structure. The current structure, located 83 feet from the ordinary high water mark, did not meet the required 150 feet distance. The staff report highlighted the need for erosion control and soil stabilization during construction. The commission focused on ensuring compliance with local ordinances and environmental integrity, particularly concerning the lake’s shoreline. Members agreed that the application merited approval, noting the maintenance-free shoreline buffer provided by existing vegetation.

The commission also considered a variance application from Steve and Peg, who sought approval to construct a one-level home to accommodate aging in place. This proposal included a garage and living space similar to the existing structure. A neighboring property owner, Dwayne Blank, supported the proposal but raised concerns about the buffer zone’s vegetation, primarily situated on his property. The commission clarified that the variance aligned with zoning regulations and addressed economic considerations, determining that it arose from unique property circumstances rather than economic benefits.

Another variance application, 024-0003, involved a request to create a second access point on Roy Lake Drive. Property owner George Lehan sought to repair a pre-existing walkway to address significant erosion issues. Lehan described the necessary improvements to enhance drainage and maintain access to the property. The commission supported the variance, emphasizing its alignment with the ordinance and comprehensive plan. Approval was granted with conditions, including a vegetative buffer between the water mark and the proposed ramp.

In addition to variance discussions, the commission reviewed a proposal to collaborate on ordinance revisions with Chris Pensan. These revisions aimed to ensure FEMA floodplain compliance, analyze septic system setbacks, and update cannabis regulations. The proposal, costing $7,500, was recommended for council approval, with a review planned for December 2024.