The most notable topic of the meeting was the proposal evaluation for a new lift station. Two engineering firms, Bolton and Mink, and Woods Engineering, presented their plans, which included discussions on design approaches and cost structures. A representative remarked on the immersive nature of this technology, likening it to a video game experience that allows users to virtually navigate and measure the proposed structures.

Woods Engineering, on the other hand, highlighted their completed preliminary work, which included necessary site sketches and descriptions for property acquisition. They argued that constructing a new lift station, instead of rehabilitating the existing one, would provide greater flexibility and reduce risks.

A key aspect of the discussions was the absence of a feasibility study, which some participants believed could have established essential parameters for both firms to work from, potentially avoiding duplicative design efforts. Despite this, the proposals were noted to be strong, with similar scopes and pricing. Bolton and Mink offered a slightly lower estimate, prompting discussion on whether to maintain a longstanding relationship with Woods Engineering or explore new perspectives.

The decision-making process was thoughtful, weighing the potential benefits of a fresh approach against the financial implications of each proposal. A motion to recommend Bolton and Mink’s proposal for the design and supervision of the new lift station was supported, highlighting a preference for innovative insights while recognizing the quality of work both firms could deliver.

The meeting also addressed the 2026 road bond update and plan review, with a recommendation set to be presented at the upcoming city council meeting. The plan aims to address the city’s road infrastructure needs, factoring in the variability of urban and rural designs. Considerations for ditching, curbs, and gutters were discussed, alongside a robust design proposal for reclaiming existing pavements and prepping subgrades.

A detailed examination of road tonnage and carrying capabilities was conducted, especially for roads frequented by commercial traffic. The design proposed included a six-inch virgin aggregate base with additional bituminous layers, suitable for the area’s sandy soils. The need for easements was also discussed, with a preference for a cost-effective acquisition approach in lower traffic areas.

An important procedural note during the meeting involved the status of Anderson Brothers, a local contractor previously on a suspension list but recently removed, allowing them to bid on projects.