18:53The referendum, scheduled for a vote on March 11, 2025, comprises two main components. The first and most substantial question requests $52 million to address critical HVAC upgrades across district buildings. These upgrades include replacing obsolete boilers and air conditioning units, many surpassing 25 years of age. The funding also encompasses making district bathrooms ADA-compliant and ensuring that the buildings are watertight. The necessity of these updates was underscored by comparisons to household maintenance practices, emphasizing the scale and urgency of the situation.

The second question in the referendum seeks just over $1 million to replace inefficient windows and mismatched doors. These changes aim to boost safety and energy efficiency, with the proposed work qualifying for state aid. The board stressed that piecemeal repairs could lead to increased costs for the community if significant failures occur without the availability of state funding.

35:25Public commentary during the meeting highlighted the need for these updates. Beth Pasner, president of the North Brunswick Township Education Association, strongly supported the referendum, citing ongoing health and safety issues within the district’s aging facilities. She mentioned that some school buildings are nearing or have exceeded 50 years in age, with existing HVAC systems failing to maintain consistent temperatures. Pasner illustrated the severity of the situation, noting that students often resort to bringing blankets to class due to the lack of adequate heating. Her arguments were echoed by other educators, including Heather Angeles, a physical education teacher, who recounted a specific incident during a field day when rainwater flooded the gym, posing safety risks. Angeles advocated for the referendum, pointing out the significant comfort and safety concerns for students and staff.

18:53The board’s efforts to address these infrastructural deficiencies are part of a broader strategy to enhance the district’s educational environment. Mr. Carter, chair of Business Operations, reviewed various improvement projects, including planned upgrades to the high school stadium and cafeteria equipment. These initiatives are part of ongoing efforts to maintain and improve facilities while managing the financial implications of such undertakings.

0:28The meeting also featured an annual financial audit presentation by Mr. Sten from the Samuel Klein Company. The audit concluded with an unmodified opinion. The board unanimously approved the audit report, recognizing the diligent work of the business office and staff in maintaining precise financial documentation.

Superintendent Janet Ciarrocca announced early school closures for staff professional learning days in February and shared plans for the upcoming retirement of a senior staff member at the end of the school year. She introduced a video prepared by the communications team to inform the community about the referendum. The video underscored the necessity of facility improvements, particularly regarding heating and cooling systems, to ensure a safe and conducive learning environment.

18:53In addition to infrastructural discussions, the meeting covered various student activities and educational initiatives. Reports highlighted recent events such as a winter pep week, the Alchemist Theater Company’s annual theater review, and a trivia night fundraiser. The Human Resources Committee, led by Dr. Paragi N. Patel, discussed personnel changes, including new hires and retirements, and plans for virtual job fairs to fill teaching positions.

The Education Committee provided updates on assessments and curriculum development, including the implementation of ACCESS testing for English Language Learners and the introduction of a new dual enrollment program allowing high school students to earn college credits. Curriculum enhancements included a pilot program for a new math curriculum and the introduction of high school courses focusing on race, class, and gender.

35:25As the meeting transitioned to a public session, community members expressed their support for the referendum and articulated the need for building improvements. The public commentary concluded with a motion to close the session, and the board moved into a closed session to discuss negotiations, legal matters, and personnel issues.