0:00The applicant, who manages a family-owned restaurant serving Dominican cuisine at the location, pleaded for the board’s understanding. They expressed a desire to extend operating hours to better serve their clientele, emphasizing a longstanding presence in the community. However, the staff’s recommendation against the variance was driven by the finding that only two out of six criteria were met, with particular emphasis on potential adverse effects on nearby residential areas.

Public commentary further highlighted parking issues, with one speaker from DRJ Holdings voicing apprehensions about overflow parking into neighboring properties due to the nightclub’s limited on-site spaces. Another speaker, who had visited the restaurant, supported the establishment but acknowledged the parking challenges, especially on weekends. These concerns were echoed by a cook from the restaurant who implored the board not to shut down the business, citing its importance to her family’s livelihood.

29:38The board’s discussions revealed a general consensus against the proposal, drawing parallels with a previous denial of a larger nightclub for similar reasons. Members expressed reluctance to deviate from staff recommendations unless faced with extraordinary circumstances, wary of setting a “bad precedent.” The applicant’s history of operating without necessary licenses was scrutinized, further diminishing confidence in their compliance with future conditions. Consequently, the board’s denial effectively nullified the need for a special exception application for the nightclub, leading to an implied withdrawal of the application.

Following this decision, the board considered a petition for a private school on Northeast 125th Street. The application received unanimous approval, having satisfied all six criteria necessary for a special exception. The proposal was lauded for its strategic property layout, which adequately addressed potential traffic concerns.

52:35In another significant agenda item, the board deliberated on a variance request for an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on Northeast 123rd Street. The property, not meeting the minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet, prompted a thorough discussion about existing zoning regulations. The applicant’s representative, Mario Baras, advocated for the ADU to accommodate his elderly parents, arguing that it aligned with the neighborhood’s character and the city’s comprehensive plan for affordable housing. Despite presenting letters of support and advocating for family unity, the board faced constraints due to the applicant meeting only one of the six criteria for approval. Discussions hinted at potential future amendments to the square footage requirement for ADUs.

1:13:47Additionally, the board evaluated a special exception request for a pet crematory on Northeast 149th Street, a proposal that sparked significant public concern from neighboring businesses. Despite assurances from the applicant about the environmentally friendly nature of their operations, studio owners nearby feared disruptions from noise and vibrations. The board moved forward with a unanimous approval, acknowledging the business as an innovative addition to the area while recognizing the community’s apprehensions.

1:33:54Lastly, discussions turned to a special exception request for Mava Gastro Bar, a venue on Northwest 7th Avenue that operates as a nightclub under city code but does not serve alcohol. The application met all necessary criteria, and the board approved it with conditions. Concerns about parking and noise were addressed, with assurances provided by the applicant about the venue’s relaxed atmosphere.