The most pressing topic was the proposed mission statement and slogan for the commission. A member introduced the new mission statement, which focuses on empowering women and advancing fair and equal treatment. This proposed statement sparked a discussion about its potential conflict with the current bylaws and whether it should replace or amend the existing mission. Ensuring alignment with the city’s bylaws was cited as a reason for consultation with the city before moving forward.

Additionally, the slogan “Where women rise communities Thrive” was presented, but some members were hesitant to decide on it without a finalized mission statement. Despite this, a vote was called by the chairwoman to approve having a slogan, which passed.

The commission also discussed logistical and operational plans, such as the “Get Fit Nomi” program’s proposed start and the Nme Business Master Class’s progress. The Chief of Staff reported on the commission’s budget, noting a remaining balance and additional funds pledged by Commissioner W. Administrative matters included updates on business cards, social media, professional headshots, and the commission’s webpage. Moreover, there was mention of quotes for shirts and a donation from the League of Women Voters.

Regarding the inaugural Commission for Women Retreat, scheduled for late August, commissioners debated over the dates and the need for more planning time. The responsibility to cover expenses was also a contentious point, with some advocating that the commissioners should pay to exemplify self-care and unity. Furthermore, the meeting raised questions about the appointment process for new members, terms of service, and reapplication procedures.

Transitioning to the issue of policy training and the handoff to new members, the commission discussed the need for clear procedures. The timing of the final meeting of the fiscal year was debated, weighing the potential impact of election runoffs in November. Suggestions were made to bring in a trainer for policy development, with a debate on whether this should occur during the recess or after the commissioners’ return.

The importance of providing comprehensive information to future commission members was also a topic of discussion. The commission underscored the need for well-researched and data-backed policies. Members were encouraged to present policies close to their hearts, with the most supported ones to be voted on. Additionally, the need for a treasurer and the management of funds raised during events were discussed.