North Port City Manager Receives 15% Salary Increase Amid Discussions on Storm Preparedness and Utility Rates

During a recent North Port City Council meeting, topics were addressed, including a 15% salary increase for City Manager Mr. Fletcher, storm preparedness efforts, and proposed adjustments to utility rates. The meeting also touched on the recruitment process for a new City Attorney and the challenges of public engagement.

5:50:41The most pressing topic of the meeting was the approved 15% salary increase for City Manager Mr. Fletcher, following an extensive performance evaluation. Council members commended Fletcher for his leadership, particularly during recovery efforts following Hurricane Ian and the city’s ongoing growth. Vice-Mayor Soaps praised Fletcher’s leadership qualities, highlighting that “I have rarely if ever met a leader like our present City Manager.” Commissioner Langdon acknowledged Fletcher’s strides in tackling legacy issues, despite noting his imperfections.

The discussion on Mr. Fletcher’s salary increase included comparisons with other municipalities, emphasizing the importance of competitive compensation to attract and retain talent. The Vice-Mayor noted that a 15% increase would bring Fletcher’s salary to approximately $247,000, aligning with similar roles in nearby cities. Some council members proposed a phased approach. Despite concerns about the optics of such an increase amidst ongoing city projects, the motion passed with a vote of 4 to 1.

0:00In the context of storm preparedness, a County Commissioner shared updates on the community’s readiness for an approaching storm, emphasizing the opening of shelters and the potential for significant storm surges. The Public Works department was noted to be preparing for potential storm impacts.

25:56The meeting also addressed the recruitment process for a new City Attorney, highlighting the demographic shifts in the job market and the challenges posed by the retirement of Baby Boomers. The recruitment strategy includes developing a position profile that reflects the city’s structure and budgetary processes, with a focus on both hard and soft skills. The importance of outreach to passive candidates and the need for a thorough vetting process were emphasized. The discussion revealed a commitment to finding a candidate who aligns well with the city’s goals and challenges.

1:40:30Additionally, the council considered proposed adjustments to water and wastewater user rates for the fiscal year 2025. A consultant presented findings from a sufficiency study, recommending a 6.92% increase in user rates due to rising operational costs. This adjustment, combined with a previously adopted 2.5% increase, would result in an approximate $9.38 monthly increase for typical customers. The presentation highlighted the utility’s capital needs, estimated at $325.7 million over the next ten years, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining a balance between operational costs and capital funding.

5:27:01Public comments during the meeting reflected concerns about the effectiveness of citizen engagement. Speakers expressed frustration that public input often does not influence council votes, advocating for a structured process that allows meaningful public participation before decisions are made. Suggestions included allowing public comments before or after council discussions on agenda items and ensuring that issues are not included in consent agendas without sufficient discussion.

4:16:03The council also discussed procedural changes to public comments and meeting decorum. Proposals included limiting public comments to one card per agenda item and incorporating voicemail comments into the public record. There was debate about the implications of such limitations on public engagement, with some members emphasizing the need for effective governance while maintaining open public discourse.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: