The downtown design manual was a primary focus of the meeting, with council members and participants scrutinizing its relevance and practicality in guiding new developments. The manual, which has been a reference for about 20 years, was described as needing substantial updates to address current development trends, such as the construction of taller buildings. Although initially intended to guide two- to three-story structures, recent projects have included buildings up to four stories, prompting discussions on the manual’s applicability. Participants emphasized the necessity of revising height standards to ensure they align with modern safety measures and community expectations.

The conversation also covered the legal implications of grandfathering existing buildings that do not meet current design standards. Concerns were expressed about the fairness of allowing older structures to deviate from the manual while imposing stricter requirements on new constructions. This raised questions about potential legal challenges if newer businesses were restricted from making modifications similar to those of existing buildings. Participants reached a general consensus that it would be unreasonable to compel older buildings to conform to the updated standards, acknowledging the prohibitive costs of such compliance. However, they agreed on the importance of enforcing the manual for new constructions to maintain a consistent aesthetic in the downtown area.

The zoning code update discussions were equally significant, with an emphasis on streamlining outdated ordinances. The council recognized the necessity of revisiting requirements that are no longer enforced or relevant to the community’s needs. For example, parking regulations for recreational vehicles were debated, with members questioning the need for restrictions that prohibit RV parking in front yards or mandate paved surfaces. The dialogue suggested a preference for eliminating regulations that do not serve the community’s interest, highlighting a broader aim to reduce regulatory burdens.

Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) emerged as a topic of interest. The council acknowledged the growing demand for diverse housing options and explored language in the zoning code to accommodate both attached and detached ADUs. The potential for innovative solutions, such as converting garages into living spaces, was discussed.

In addition to zoning and design manual updates, the meeting addressed the need for a more strategic review of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This change was proposed to ensure that the council can influence decisions effectively rather than being constrained by an already established budget.

The meeting also touched on community initiatives like the “buy nothing” group, which promotes sustainability and community engagement by facilitating the exchange of items among residents without monetary transactions. This initiative was praised as a means of fostering a supportive community environment.