The council’s deliberations focused on possible modifications to the city’s Mixed Use district (MU2) zoning. These changes could allow for multifamily housing, which is currently limited to residential units situated above non-residential spaces. The introduction of PUDs was discussed as a mechanism to offer flexibility in setbacks, building heights, and parking requirements, making it possible to meet both developer needs and city regulations. Some members expressed concern that the PUD process might complicate project approvals, though the general sentiment leaned towards its potential benefits in accommodating growth.

A particular point of discussion was the existing MU2 zoning’s utility and its appropriateness for future needs. Questions were raised about whether the zoning was established based on current conditions rather than future aspirations. The council recognized that eliminating the MU2 designation could lead to numerous non-conforming uses, necessitating extensive rezoning efforts. The conversation broadened to include the potential redevelopment of a large, mostly vacant lot owned by Century Link, currently zoned as residential (R1). Should Century Link decide to sell, this could enhance the attractiveness of nearby developments, prompting calls for careful zoning consideration in the vicinity.

In addition to zoning, the council explored the need to update the Downtown Design Manual to reflect current zoning code allowances, specifically regarding building heights in mixed-use structures. The current manual limits buildings to three stories, while the zoning code permits four. The council debated whether to undertake a comprehensive rewrite involving public input and external consultants or to have city staff manage updates internally, prioritizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

The council also turned its attention to the broader implications of their work on the city’s development reputation. One member highlighted that North St. Paul was not included in a recent ranking of Minnesota communities perceived as development-friendly, prompting discussions on how the city might improve its appeal to prospective developers. This conversation underscored the importance of aligning city codes with state regulations while considering community needs and historical context.

During the meeting, the council reviewed its work plan, noting progress on various initiatives and anticipating an update to the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in the upcoming month. The Metropolitan Council’s recent system statement projected a modest population increase of approximately 50 residents over the next 20 years.

The meeting also addressed efforts to attract development to downtown North St. Paul, particularly for lots labeled for development but lacking interest. Challenges such as existing infrastructure limitations were noted, though innovative developers might still find viable solutions. The council considered whether zoning issues could be deterring potential developers and acknowledged the need for thoughtful strategies to overcome such barriers.

In the reports segment, a member shared updates from the Economic Development Authority (EDA), including plans to revisit past applicants for a facade improvement program and positive developments among local businesses, such as new window installations. Additionally, a recent volunteer day at the local food shelf was highlighted, with reflections on the importance of addressing food insecurity and fostering community involvement.