The fiber optics fund was discussed extensively, revealing its current deficit of just under two million dollars, down from 2.1 million dollars. This fund has been a source of concern due to operational challenges and incomplete fiber installations, metaphorically described as “holes in the ground.” These issues have led to financial burdens on the city, and the fund’s deficit remains a issue with no clear resolution in sight. The council acknowledged the absence of a plan to rectify the situation, with some members labeling the fiber optics investment as a “bad decision.” The current infrastructure, including an outdated center housing essential switches, further complicates efforts to improve the fund’s standing.

Discussions also touched on the long-term agreements tied to the fiber optics fund, with approximately nine years remaining on these deals. Council members expressed concern over the potential for a 1.5 million dollar deficit by the agreements’ end. The feasibility of such a transfer was debated, with the electric fund considered the only viable option for bridging the gap.

In addition to the fiber optics fund, the meeting delved into the broader financial health of the city. The 2024 comprehensive financial report was presented by LB Carlson LLP, highlighting several key findings. Despite the fiber optics fund’s challenges, the city saw an increase in taxable market value by 7.8%. The general fund showed a healthy financial position, with an increase in both cash and fund balance attributed to improved financial conditions in the general fund and non-major capital project funds. However, the fiber optics fund’s deficit, along with other financial obligations, underscored the need for vigilant fiscal management.

The audit report provided by Jackie Heagle of LB Carlson LLP confirmed that there were no deficiencies in internal controls or instances of non-compliance identified during the audit. However, it did note a single finding regarding the late payment of bills, with two out of 40 tested disbursements made past the statutory requirement. Heagle also highlighted the need for the council to monitor deficit balances in certain funds, specifically the fiber optics fund, which remains a concern.

Further discussions addressed the city’s use of federal coronavirus recovery funds, revealing that approximately 1.366 million dollars had been allocated to cover public safety expenditures. This move, while providing temporary relief to the general fund, was recognized as a one-time adjustment, with salaries expected to revert to the general fund by 2025. The council passed a resolution to ensure these funds were spent or encumbered by the end of 2024, preventing any potential loss.

The city’s financial standing was further examined through the lens of enterprise funds, which showed an overall increase in net position by approximately 2 million dollars, largely due to investments in utility infrastructure. Specific funds, such as the electric, water, and surface water funds, reported positive results, while the solid waste fund ended with an operating loss of approximately 100,000 dollars. The discussion noted that despite this loss, no rate increases were anticipated for water, surface water, and wastewater services in 2026.

Additionally, the meeting addressed the Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Economic Development Authority (EDA) funds, detailing changes in cash and investments. The electric fund was specifically mentioned for its budgetary transfer of 1.1 million dollars to the street maintenance fund, resulting in a positive swing in net position despite a decrease in unrestricted fund balance.