One focus of the meeting was the discussion on proposed zoning code text amendments, presented by a staff member. These changes aim to redefine “residential dwellings” and adjust mixed-use districts to align with current zoning terminology. Notably, the term “corridor highway” was revised to “corridor mixed use,” and there was a proposal to allow multi-family residential developments in the MU2 district through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval process. This would offer new developmental avenues in areas previously limited to single-family homes. Additionally, there was a discussion on the potential inclusion of designated freight pick-up and drop-off areas in future zoning codes, a suggestion that arose from concerns about inadequate loading zones in larger residential buildings.

The public hearing for these zoning amendments was met with silence, as no community members were present to provide input. Following the hearing, a unanimous vote by the commission led to the recommendation of these zoning changes to the city council.

The council then shifted its focus to the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which serves as a long-range planning document essential for aligning city expenditures with the adopted comprehensive plan. A staff member emphasized that the CIP is updated annually and includes major capital purchases and improvements such as park enhancements and building upgrades, with a threshold of $125,000 to qualify as capital improvements. The council was informed that maintaining the community center would require approximately $6.8 million, a decision yet to be finalized.

During the CIP discussion, concerns were raised about specific projects, like a 12-inch looping on the Gateway Trail projected for 2030 at a cost of $731,000. Members questioned the feasibility of endorsing such projects without a thorough understanding of their alignment with the comprehensive plan. The staff clarified that these projects are placeholders, subject to further vetting when considered for execution. The council was informed that to maintain consistent funding levels, an 8-10% annual tax levy increase would be necessary, posing a potential challenge.

The meeting also touched upon the regional planning initiative “Imagine 2050,” led by the Met Council, which aims to establish development goals and policies for the metro area. North St. Paul received its system statement in September, with projections indicating a stable population and employment levels through 2050. However, the city faces the challenge of adding 33 affordable housing units by 2050, a requirement complicated by the need for collaboration with private developers. The Met Council’s designation of North St. Paul as an “urban edge” city allows for some flexibility in development strategies, unlike suburban areas bound by minimum density requirements.

The council’s discussion also included an update on the comprehensive plan, with a focus on reviewing its current vision and goals. The plan outlines North St. Paul as a community that promotes stewardship and involves an informed citizenry. Council members agreed to postpone a discussion on the comprehensive plan update until January, allowing more time for review.