The primary concern was the Southwood Nature Preserve, where invasive species management and funding took center stage. A speaker named David voiced concerns about the preserve’s condition, emphasizing the extensive volunteer efforts previously invested in the area. He highlighted contributions from individuals such as Lloyd, Dave, and Sue Springborn, whose husband donated equipment for park maintenance. David advocated strongly for manual removal of invasive species like Buckthorn over chemical treatments due to potential impacts on the nearby water supply, stating, “I’m not in favor of using poison; I’m in favor of pulling the stuff rather than the poison.”

David provided a historical overview of Southwood, mentioning its previous name, North St. Paul Park, and its certification as a wildlife sanctuary by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). He proudly noted, “We were the first city in North St. Paul to win the leap award,” crediting the community’s efforts in eradicating invasive species and fostering a healthy ecosystem. However, he lamented the decline in volunteer support, particularly from younger individuals, and proposed that funds be specifically allocated to Southwood rather than other parks, arguing, “I don’t think there is any money designated for Southwood anymore.”

The commission discussed alternative methods for Buckthorn management, including the potential use of goats, inspired by successful initiatives in neighboring Maplewood. David mentioned his daughter’s expertise as a wildlife biologist, explaining that using goats would require a sustained effort over several years. He also stressed the urgency of addressing invasive species before they seeded further and emphasized the need for regular maintenance to prevent neglect, stating, “I hate to see all the work that everybody did go down the tube because we got a nice Nature Preserve.”

Commission members, including Sarah, provided updates on grant opportunities for invasive plant removal. Sarah noted that documentation provided by David had been forwarded for potential grant writing. She also mentioned ongoing research into using goats for managing invasive plants, acknowledging that it would take time to fully explore this option. David expressed concern that there appeared to be no major plans or budget allocations for Southwood in the coming decade.

The discussion also touched upon issues with the Southwood task force. David expressed frustration over a lack of communication from its leadership, specifically citing irregular meetings and updates. He urged for better coordination and transparency, stating, “We find out by accident what’s going on.” Maintenance concerns, such as the need for public works to address fallen trees, were also raised.

Another topic of concern was the turtle crossing signs. One sign had been stolen, and the commission discussed the need for proper signage to ensure public awareness and wildlife safety. It was noted that the signs had to be taken down in the fall and reinstalled in the spring, as per an agreement with the DNR.

In addition to Southwood, the commission reviewed the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the existing park improvement plans. Discussions included funding allocations for park improvements and the potential need for adjustments based on current priorities and projects. Specific parks, such as McKnight Fields, were mentioned, leading to debates about the allocation of funds and whether certain line items should be adjusted based on recent planning discussions.

The conversation also focused on physical improvements needed for Silver Lake and Southwood parks. For Silver Lake, members discussed the potential replacement of playground equipment within the next decade and the need to address shoreline issues caused by invasive species. For Southwood, the aging metal bridge and observation deck were highlighted as requiring replacement and maintenance, with estimated costs proposed to inform future budgeting decisions.

Casey Lake and its surrounding features were another focal point. Discussions included the underutilization of a hockey rink and the potential repurposing of a neglected ball field. Suggestions were made to convert these areas into more functional spaces, such as soccer fields or volleyball courts.