The board’s approval of Al Nylam Pharmaceuticals’ request to modify their special permit was a key decision. The modification allows for two new building additions totaling over 10,000 square feet. Representatives from Al Nylam, alongside PAR Corporation, presented the proposed changes, which include a 6,000 square-foot addition to the manufacturing area and adjustments to a frozen storage section and parking lot. The representatives assured that these changes would not alter the existing stormwater system capacity, as no new impervious areas would be created. The board confirmed that no stormwater review was necessary, although approval from the fire department remained pending.

Board members discussed whether the modifications should include conditions from the original permit and emphasized the importance of obtaining fire department approval. After a public hearing with no comments from the public, the board moved to approve the permit modification unanimously.

In addition to permit modifications, the board discussed a definitive plan for subdividing a lot on Newland Street into two separate lots, with a third designated as open space to be conveyed to a land trust. The plan includes a private road with a 300-foot length and a cul-de-sac, for which several waivers were requested, including those for street trees and sidewalks due to the rural setting. The board debated the practicality of these waivers, ultimately agreeing to vote on them collectively while maintaining standard conditions for water, sewer, and affordable housing.

Another point of discussion was the proposed change in commercial hours of operation in Norton. The board considered extending the hours to 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven days a week, to encourage business activity. Members discussed the potential benefits of earlier opening times for breakfast establishments and noted the need for flexibility to accommodate various business models, especially on the main road. The possibility of 24-hour operation for some businesses was also mentioned, although this was seen as a potentially progressive step.

The board also addressed complaints filed against them concerning open meeting laws. Joseph Kaggliano and Kelly Gallagher both raised issues about notification procedures and the opportunity to speak at meetings. The board decided to respond to these complaints with a unified letter.

In the course of the meeting, the board acknowledged the need for future sessions to remain focused and efficient, with discussions on zoning bylaws and other topics planned for upcoming meetings. They emphasized the importance of maintaining fresh dialogue and avoiding repetitive discussions. The board confirmed dates for future meetings and considered the possibility of virtual sessions to accommodate all participants effectively.