One of the primary topics was the discussion of the revised concussion policy originally established in 2020. The policy update was aimed at streamlining the document while maintaining essential protocols for the return-to-play process for students recovering from concussions. Despite questions about the nature of the revisions, it was clarified that the changes were not substantial but rather linguistic adjustments to enhance clarity. The importance of effective communication with families and students regarding concussion protocols was emphasized, and the policy will undergo a two-reading process, allowing for further member inquiries before a final vote.

In addition to the concussion policy, the committee revisited the meal charge policy, updating it to align with new state guidelines and the complexities presented by the universal free meal program. The policy clarifies what constitutes reimbursable and non-reimbursable items, addresses student accounts, and outlines collection procedures for outstanding balances. Importantly, it assures families that students will not be denied meals due to an inability to pay. This revision aims to reduce confusion among parents regarding meal statuses and charges while providing financial assistance information and meeting USDA non-discrimination requirements.

Another policy under review was the entrance age policy. The committee addressed the need to reinstate language inadvertently omitted from previous revisions, particularly concerning the enrollment of kindergarten and first-grade students. This policy ensures that families understand the options available for enrolling their children, especially when transitioning from private kindergartens or other districts.

Parallel to policy discussions, the student representative, Benson, shared a remarkable achievement in fundraising. The recently completed PTO Boosterthon Glow Fun Run fundraiser exceeded its goal, raising over $224,000. The funds will be allocated to pay for a new playground and support various student-centered activities, including assemblies, enrichment programs, and fifth-grade yearbooks. As a part of a traditional celebratory event for surpassing fundraising goals, two staff members will participate in a community event, with details to be revealed later.

Benson also highlighted the success of the boys’ basketball team, which is experiencing its most successful season in two decades, and the girls’ team, which holds a winning record. Other student-led initiatives included the Playbook project at the middle school, which promotes inclusivity and tolerance, and the preparation for the middle school drama club’s production of “Annie.”

The committee also engaged in discussions about the superintendent’s progress on established goals for the academic year. The superintendent reported a delay in developing a comprehensive strategic plan for student success, acknowledging that the goal was behind schedule. An internal structure for this work has been initiated, with plans to involve families in a strategic planning committee. Surveys focusing on students’ sense of safety and support within the school environment will be distributed, with adjustments made to accommodate younger students.

Efforts to enhance student learning through district-wide data review processes were also discussed. This involves analyzing curriculum measures, classroom observations, and state assessments to create individualized student action plans. The superintendent’s school visits, learning walks, and transition meetings between different grade levels aim to identify effective educational practices and areas for improvement.

Additionally, the importance of the intervention block in the daily schedule was highlighted. This block is intended to provide students with access to both intervention and enrichment opportunities. At Norton High School, the LLB block offers students tutoring and support, especially beneficial for those who might have missed classes.

Lastly, the committee touched upon the superintendent’s involvement in an induction program, which focuses on developing principals as instructional leaders. Concerns about the upcoming school committee elections potentially affecting the superintendent’s evaluation were raised, with suggestions to complete the evaluation by the end of April to ensure continuity and involvement of current committee members.