Nutley Residents Voice Concerns Over Proposed Warehouse Amid Traffic and Safety Issues

The recent Nutley Rent Leveling Board meeting was marked by significant public commentary and board resolutions, with the proposed warehouse project drawing the most attention. Residents expressed concerns over potential traffic disruptions and safety hazards, while the board tackled various resolutions concerning township operations, including tax exemptions and upcoming community initiatives.

46:27A primary focus of the meeting was the proposed warehouse project, which has sparked considerable opposition among Nutley residents. A resident highlighted concerns about increased traffic and the safety of local roads, particularly in light of feedback from the Department of Transportation officials who assessed the jug handle at Cathedral and Kingsland Street. Despite three traffic studies claiming local roads could accommodate the expected increase in traffic, residents voiced skepticism, citing potential noise and air pollution from the warehouse operation hours, which would run from 5:00 a.m. to midnight. With trucks arriving from major routes like Route 21 and Route 3, the resident argued that the project would negatively impact property values across Nutley. The resident emphasized community opposition by noting over 2,000 signatures gathered for an online petition against the warehouse, with the majority coming from Nutley residents.

The discourse surrounding the warehouse project also touched on ongoing negotiations with Mr. Diaz, who has shown a willingness to consider alternative commercial ventures for the site. While the hearing on the warehouse proposal has been postponed due to significant amendments requiring further expert review, the board expressed cautious optimism about reaching a more favorable resolution. Some board members noted improved relations with Mr. Diaz, which could potentially lead to a positive outcome that benefits the community.

16:52In addition to the warehouse discussion, the board addressed pressing community needs through various resolutions. One noteworthy resolution granted tax exemptions to war veterans who are permanently disabled, with a specific case highlighted involving a veteran named Cesar Nicadaz, who received a full exemption from property taxes starting May 1, along with a refund for previous payments. This resolution passed with unanimous approval.

18:52Another resolution involved the authorization for the mayor to enter a contract with Associated Appraisal Group Inc. for appraisal services at a cost not to exceed $15,000. This resolution included a stipulation for transparency, requiring the business entity to disclose any contributions to political or candidate committees. The board unanimously supported this measure.

22:59In a bid to enhance community safety, the board supported the “Click It or Ticket” resolution, which aims to increase seat belt usage rates in New Jersey from 94% to 95.5%.

35:58The meeting also addressed the controversial overnight parking ordinance, with a resident, Habid Misri, voicing concerns about its impact on renters. Misri argued that the requirement for permits to park at a distance from residences, particularly in adverse weather conditions, was unfair to residents. Despite his arguments, including a suggestion for a permit system similar to those in neighboring towns to serve as a revenue stream, the board maintained the ordinance was essential for community safety and declined to consider changes.

24:53These included recognizing May as Military Appreciation Month and designating June 6, 2025, as National Gun Violence Awareness Day. Both resolutions were unanimously approved.

32:58Finally, the meeting concluded with a resolution to award a professional services contract to F Planning LLC for plan and technical review services concerning the Franklin Avenue redevelopment area. The board ensured transparency by confirming the firm’s compliance with necessary business entity disclosure certification.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: