0:02One notable issue at the meeting was the ongoing threat of the emerald ash borer and its implications for property owners. The board discussed the financial burden of tree removal on private property owners, highlighting that the cost of removing a single tree could exceed $3,000. Several board members expressed concern that the current 20-day timeline for tree removal after notification might not be realistic, given the high demand for reputable tree removal services. One participant noted that delays were common, with service providers often unable to schedule removals promptly, raising the question of whether the timeline should be extended to allow for scheduling difficulties and weather conditions.

14:04In addressing this issue, the board explored the potential for financial assistance programs similar to those in surrounding communities. The city of Woodbury’s innovative approach was cited, where $500,000 is allocated annually from 2025 to 2027 to assist with tree removal costs, offering reimbursement or deferred tax assessments to property owners. The board considered adopting a similar model, with suggestions for deferred payment plans that could spread the cost of tree removal over time, akin to street reconstruction projects. This approach would alleviate the immediate financial strain on residents while ensuring compliance with city codes.

The discussion also emphasized the importance of educating property owners about the risks posed by nuisance trees, particularly those affected by EAB. The board expressed a commitment to enforcing existing ordinances while considering modifications to enhance public safety. Feedback was sought on the possibility of implementing a repayment process for tree removal costs, akin to street assessments, and extending the current removal timelines to better accommodate scheduling challenges.

40:56Another topic was the inspection process for trees under city code. The current system allows the city forester to inspect properties if a nuisance is suspected, though inspections often occur based on complaints. The capacity of city staff to handle the volume of complaints and perform inspections was a concern, as was the potential for contracting certified inspectors if needed. The board deliberated on maintaining a complaint-driven framework, which was deemed effective, while ensuring that inspections are conducted to address public safety concerns.

Updates from the forestry department revealed ongoing efforts to manage EAB in public spaces and explore grant opportunities for the removal and replacement of diseased trees. The department is considering not renewing treatment contracts for ash trees, as treatments are costly and not always effective for trees in advanced stages of decline. The board was informed of plans for an Arbor Day tree giveaway at a new location, emphasizing the importance of clear communication to prevent no-shows, which had been an issue in previous events.