Oakland Borough Council Reduces Affordable Housing Obligation in Resolution to Meet State Deadline

In a recent special meeting, the Oakland Borough Council approved a resolution to lower its affordable housing obligation from a state-calculated 306 units to 262 units. This decision was made to meet a looming deadline while avoiding potential litigation that could arise from non-compliance with state mandates. Failure to adopt the resolution by the January 31 deadline could have left the borough vulnerable to builders’ remedy lawsuits.

The council meeting focused on the requirements set by New Jersey’s affordable housing legislation, which demands municipalities adopt binding resolutions that stipulate their housing obligations. The state’s Department of Community Affairs initially calculated Oakland’s obligation at 306 units. However, after a analysis, the borough’s planning consultant, Carolyn Ryder, recommended a revised figure of 262 units. This adjustment was based on a examination of land capacity and the removal of 23 parcels deemed undevelopable.

During the meeting, it was emphasized that the state’s calculation included properties identified through aerial mapping, which the borough officials disputed after field inspections. These inspections were conducted by the mayor and the borough engineer, who verified the viability of the identified parcels. The council discussed the risks associated with adopting a lower number, acknowledging that it might increase the likelihood of legal challenges, though such challenges could occur even with the higher state figure.

Looking ahead, the council must develop a housing element and fair share plan by June 30, detailing how it will meet its affordable housing obligations. This plan will consider zoning adjustments, vacant land adjustments, and other strategies to fulfill Oakland’s responsibilities under the Fair Housing Act.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: