During the meeting, the budget presentation took center stage, as the board examined the breakdown of expenses and the consequences of the decreased state aid. Approximately 61% of the budget relies on local tax levies, and to mitigate the impact, the district has turned to additional funds received at the end of the previous school year. Adjustments were made to expiring grants, and measures such as using Maintenance Reserve funds and declaring a 6.15% budgeted fund balance were discussed. The board aims to sustain rigorous learning, infrastructure, and communication standards. Investments were earmarked to support high-quality and differentiated instruction, update technological services, improve media outlet engagement, and explore grant opportunities for cost-saving measures. The need for a safe route to school for all students was acknowledged, including updating biking policies and partnering with Camden County agencies to access grant funding for research studies and additional equipment.

Collaboration with Collingswood was a recurring theme, with the shared services and cost-saving measures being a focal point. Clarifications were sought regarding the shared custodial services and the use of Collingswood buses for transporting Oaklyn students to extracurricular activities. Ensuring accurate representation of these services was deemed important, as was the advocacy for the school district’s budget. Concerns were raised about potential funding cuts, and the community was urged to voice their concerns to state representatives. Accurate budget figures were emphasized in advocacy efforts, particularly in a legislative letter and projected enrollment figures.

The enrollment numbers and their effect on the budget were scrutinized, with discussions on the impact of declining enrollment and the accuracy of projections. Nine preschool students were reported to be on a waiting list, leading to considerations of using additional space from Collingswood to accommodate more students. However, this could potentially affect rental income. Board members also addressed the delay in the presentation of budget-related documents, expressing frustration over receiving information just before the vote.

The board also delved into concerns about racial bias at Collingswood High School, emphasizing the importance of open dialogue and proactive measures to address racism and bias within the community. Workshops and panel discussions were proposed as part of these efforts. The proposed changes to school facilities in Collingswood, including the closure of Sharp School, were debated. The challenges of balancing capacity issues, the emotional attachment to existing buildings, and the need to provide a more inclusive and accessible educational environment were acknowledged.

Public comments brought attention to concerns about the budget and its impact on students, particularly in light of the pandemic’s negative effects on students’ academic progress and socialization skills. The community expressed gratitude to the teachers and the Board for their efforts in supporting students amid budget cuts.

The Superintendent presented the enrollment report. Discussions on the safety drill suspension and anti-bullying reports ensued. The Business Administrative Report included budget transfers, financial statements, and contracts for therapy services. The Curriculand Personnel Committee proposed various approvals, including field trips, medical leave, and contracts for teaching and administrative staff. The Community Relations and Policy Committee discussed PTA activities, the OMAC report, and the Oakland Education Foundation. Policies were reviewed, covering guidance counseling, bilingual education, and educational equity. A debate arose over policy 2260, with concerns about certain aspects of the policy being addressed. The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn.