The focal point of the meeting was Resolution 2625, which proposed hiring Jennifer L. Heler from Palestina and Associates LLC to assist the council with planning matters related to the 600 Boardwalk. The resolution faced opposition from several quarters, with critics questioning the necessity of the contract and the process by which the planner was selected. Concerns were raised about the lack of a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process and the potential for conflicts of interest, as the selection was based on a recommendation rather than a competitive bidding process. This prompted a call for the resolution to be pulled from the consent agenda for further discussion.

Matthew Valichko, a representative from the Plaza Place Civic Association, was among those who voiced objections. Valichko questioned the absence of an RFP and sought clarity on the planner’s role, potential conflicts, and the public availability of her report. Echoing these concerns, Dave Hayes argued that the city already had sufficient planning expertise, warning against forming a “shadow planning board” that could override existing decisions regarding the boardwalk.

Emphasizing the importance of a transparent process, James Turtle, representing various organizations, highlighted the need for a comprehensive master plan that adheres to community interests. This sentiment was echoed by other speakers who underscored the significance of public engagement and the imperative to avoid any appearance of impropriety in the council’s decision-making process.

The council members themselves were divided on the issue. Some expressed a desire for greater transparency and a clearer understanding of the planner’s scope of work before proceeding. One council member suggested a three-week delay to allow for further discussion and ensure alignment among council members and clarity for the public. Others advocated for moving forward, arguing that the planner’s external perspective could provide valuable insights to inform future decisions.

Beyond the boardwalk planner debate, the council meeting addressed several other topics, including the city’s capital plan for 2026 to 2030. The plan detailed ongoing and upcoming infrastructure projects, with significant funding allocated for drainage improvements, road upgrades, and recreational facilities. The council highlighted a $3.5 million grant secured from county open space funds for a comprehensive recreational facility on the 3400 block, featuring playground equipment, multipurpose turf, and courts for pickleball, tennis, and basketball.

The meeting also featured discussions about upgrading municipal infrastructure, with a $23.8 million request for the current year and a five-year projection of $73.4 million. Projects included LED lighting upgrades, HVAC improvements, and maintenance of public buildings. The council noted the importance of debt management.

A shared services agreement to construct additional affordable housing units was also a topic of discussion. Recognizing the ongoing demand for such housing, the council authorized the construction of an additional 12 units, building on the city’s existing commitment to provide 24 units. This decision was influenced by cost-effectiveness considerations and the anticipation of future needs.

Highlighting community engagement, the council was introduced to a citizen-led initiative called CLAMS—Citizens Looking to Assist the Merchants—aimed at boosting economic activity on the north end of the boardwalk. The initiative proposed raising funds to support local businesses, with a potential goal of reaching $100,000 through matching donations from merchants.

Public safety was another focus, with the announcement of a recognition ceremony scheduled for February 25th to honor local heroes from the police, fire department, and beach patrol. Additionally, the council discussed the future of the municipal court, considering Ocean City’s potential role as a regional court location due to its status as the busiest municipal court in Cape May County.