The playground proposal sparked a discussion, with initial estimates placing costs between $1.5 million to $2 million. Environmental regulations posed challenges, as the site would require construction directly on the beach without plumbing, and a bulkhead for water management appeared unlikely to receive permit approval. Some council members voiced enthusiasm for the playground, citing community fundraising potential and its ability to invigorate an underutilized boardwalk area. However, others questioned the practicality of adding another playground when the city already has 31, expressing concerns over its operational viability, particularly at night when beach activities might overshadow playground interest.

The council considered the feasibility of the project, with differing opinions on whether the playground should target daytime or evening visitors, as the latter time frame might attract more families post-beach activities. Funding concerns were raised, with skepticism about the $30,000 design cost for a bulkhead and the overall financial impact on taxpayers. The absence of strong community backing over the past year was cited as a reason to potentially table the project. The necessity for a clear consensus among council members and the community was emphasized before any resources were allocated.

Public input further illustrated the divide, with one resident opposing the playground due to potential hurricane and nor’easter impact on the beach, advocating instead for the preservation of open space. Another noted successful community-driven playground projects in other beach towns and suggested that Ocean City could similarly benefit through collective fundraising efforts.

Beyond the playground debate, the council addressed a bond ordinance for the San Castle Park Recreation Complex, which includes a $3.5 million county grant. This development promises a modern recreation area with new facilities, although supply chain issues have delayed construction timelines until after the summer season.

The council also discussed the implementation of new downtown street lighting on Asbury Avenue. This project aims to install a modern lighting system adaptable to lighting levels and capable of integrating holiday decorations. Concerns were raised about potential health implications of LED lighting, with a resident urging the council to postpone related resolutions until further research could be conducted.

In addition to these infrastructure projects, the meeting touched upon the council’s recent decision not to relocate the police department to the Crown Bank building. This decision followed a $64,000 professional services contract for design work, which began before the council completed due diligence on the building. The council acknowledged the need for transparency and accountability in future expenditures.