Ocean City Council Faces Allegations of Police Misconduct, Approves Infrastructure Projects

The Ocean City Council meeting on September 26, 2024, was marked by serious allegations of police misconduct, significant infrastructure developments, and community-driven initiatives. A citizen, Jonathan Dice, addressed the council, claiming severe mistreatment by a police officer that resulted in lasting injuries, sparking a call for accountability. Meanwhile, the council proceeded with the approval of several ordinances aimed at enhancing city infrastructure and facilities.

0:00One notable issue discussed was the allegation of police misconduct brought forward by Jonathan Dice. During the public comment section, Dice detailed an incident involving Officer John Peter Dupont, accusing the officer of causing permanent nerve damage to his wrists due to excessively tight handcuffing during an arrest. Dice claimed that Dupont entered his home without invitation and arrested him in front of his children. According to Dice, a doctor later confirmed that the nerves in his wrists were severed, leading to permanent numbness. Dice expressed frustration over what he perceived as a lack of accountability for police actions and urged the council to address the matter, framing it as a broader issue of public safety and accountability.

14:30Dice’s account was echoed by another citizen who also expressed grievances related to law enforcement. The speaker criticized the behavior of Officer Dupont, describing it as “outrageous” and called upon the Chief of Police to have Dupont clarify his actions in front of the council. They invoked constitutional rights and historical references to emphasize their point, alleging that government operations were veering away from lawful authority.

In response to these serious allegations, the council listened attentively but did not provide an immediate public response, as is often the case with ongoing inquiries or legal matters. The gravity of the accusations underscored a need for further investigation and review by the relevant authorities to ensure transparency and accountability in local law enforcement practices.

Simultaneously, the council focused on advancing several infrastructure projects that promise to enhance public amenities and services within Ocean City. Ordinance 2411 was introduced, which allocates $6.3 million for various city improvements. This includes matching funds for grant-funded projects targeting the North End and ramp replacement at Morland Terrace, as well as the acquisition of two parking lots adjacent to City Hall to increase public parking capacity. The ordinance faced no public opposition during its discussion, and it was adopted unanimously, reflecting broad support for city enhancements.

The council also addressed Ordinance 2412, authorizing a lease agreement for Municipal Court operations during the construction of a new public safety building. This measure passed without public comment.

In addition to these significant legislative actions, the council considered and approved amendments to the municipal fees as necessitated by changes to the Open Public Records Act. This adjustment was encapsulated in Ordinance 2414, which, like the other ordinances, received unanimous support.

31:32Beyond legislative matters, the council meeting featured community-driven discussions. One council member expressed gratitude for the council’s efforts in addressing sewage and alcohol-related issues. They proposed transforming an open space on Ninth Street, currently frequented by dog owners, into a community garden.

Another community topic involved the revitalization of the Faith and Family Weekend, an event previously held by the Ocean City St. Peter’s United Methodist Church. A representative from the church lamented the event’s discontinuation and called for renewed support to promote community and faith-based tourism initiatives. This sentiment was part of a broader discussion on community engagement and the role of leadership in fostering local events.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: