A resident of Glen Cove opposed the marina, emphasizing its potential impact on the area’s character, which dates back to 1908. He described Glen Cove as a community of small residential homes and narrow lagoons, where residents engage in activities like float parties and block gatherings. The introduction of a commercial marina, he argued, would jeopardize these community activities and alter the neighborhood’s essence. His concerns were compounded by procedural confusion, as he questioned how work could commence without local approval, despite a stop work order issued by lagoon owners. The zoning office reportedly claimed no jurisdiction over the project, adding to residents’ frustration.

The council acknowledged that while they could not halt improvements made by the marina on the waterside of the bulkhead, operating a commercial marina in a residential zone without a use variance is prohibited. A reminder letter had been sent to the property owner. This situation has led to apprehensions within the council about potential litigation if the marina proceeds without proper permits. Concerns were raised regarding the city’s role in ensuring regulatory oversight and preventing any unauthorized development.

Residents expressed gratitude for the council’s attention to the marina’s operations but also voiced concerns about the possibility of administrative decisions being made without public discussion. One speaker questioned why the marina owner would invest in the project without assurances from the city.

The council also addressed land use and zoning issues more broadly, particularly concerning a property owner in Glen Cove. The administration discussed a proposal to swap land, which was deemed not in the taxpayers’ best interest. It was emphasized that no capital project could proceed without council approval. Despite the administration’s inability to halt marina construction, they assured residents that operational interventions would occur if zoning violations were confirmed. A zoning official could issue a notice of violation for any non-permitted use, though stopping work outright remained beyond their authority.

One council member expressed confidence in the integrity of the system, assuring residents that zoning and planning board processes would be followed. This reassurance aimed to alleviate concerns about potential procedural failures regarding the marina’s development.

The meeting also featured discussion about ongoing construction delays at Maran Park, with residents reporting issues related to excessive dirt and gravel affecting drainage. The council committed to updating the public on the paving timeline through the weekly newsletter, acknowledging challenges posed by weather and staffing issues.

In addition to zoning and development matters, the meeting allowed residents to discuss broader governance issues. One resident cited a personal story about being barred from coaching Little League, attributing the decision to the Ocean City Youth Athletic Association (OCYAA) and seeking council intervention for resolution. Another resident expressed concerns about the local police force’s compliance with constitutional standards, sharing his grievances about interactions with law enforcement and the judicial system.