Susan Krabanner, speaking on behalf of Ocean City 2050, articulated a strong opposition to the proposal, arguing that it could undermine public safeguards and expose the city to legal risks. She stated, “This piecemeal approach threatens the integrity of the boardwalk, the master plan, and community character that has defined Ocean City for generations.” Krabanner emphasized the necessity of adhering to established processes, like the boardwalk subcommittee’s work, and warned against allowing any property to bypass these protocols.

David Hayes, a retired engineer and resident, echoed these concerns, highlighting the planning board’s recent rejection of a related proposal for 600 Boardwalk. Hayes pointed out what he described as a conflict of interest, noting that the repair cost estimates were provided by a firm linked to the developer. He argued that financial factors, not the pier’s condition, led to its closure, stating, “Wonderland operated continuously for over 50 years before closing.” Hayes expressed fear that the rehabilitation designation could be misused to justify demolishing existing structures for a radically different development.

Marie Hayes, who supported her husband’s views, lauded the planning board’s decision and cautioned against setting a dangerous precedent that could encourage similar requests from other boardwalk property owners. She referenced a poll showing community resistance to a high-rise hotel at the site and reminded the council of past high-rise proposals that were wisely ignored.

Resident Jim Kelly called for respect for the planning board’s judgment, citing a petition signed by nearly 400 residents urging the council to honor the boardwalk subcommittee process. Kelly advocated for constructive dialogue with the developer and urged the council to focus on community engagement and leadership.

Conversely, Heather Neville, a boardwalk business owner, supported the rehabilitation, arguing that it could revitalize the area. She pointed to declining revenues and warned that without new development, the boardwalk could face further deterioration. Neville advocated for a luxurious hotel.

Beyond the Wonderland Pier debate, the meeting addressed various other city matters. Mayor Jay Gillian updated attendees on the police substation at 8th and the Boulevard, noting it had received its elevator permit, allowing the police to potentially move in by the end of the month. The mayor also recommended seeking bids for demolishing the main police station on Central Avenue, which would free up approximately 66 parking spots for the summer season. Additionally, the mayor announced upcoming renovations at the dog park on 45th Street, which would include adding a pavilion and making fence repairs, with completion expected by the end of February.

Regarding financial matters, the council unanimously passed Ordinance 2517, simplifying the reappointment process for zoning board members whose terms had expired. A resolution adopting the 2026 budget for the special improvement district, totaling $361,553 for entertainment and promotional events, was also approved without objection.

In other citizen comments, Bill Hartre voiced dissatisfaction over $19 million spent on the 16th and Haven lot, criticizing the administration for not securing funds before property values rose. He expressed frustration with the current council meetings, describing them as rife with “the background noise of laughter” from those observing the proceedings.

Finally, Nancy Nero inquired about the status of a 3% room tax on online booking agencies, an issue she had previously raised. The council promised to provide more information after the meeting.