Ocean (Monmouth County) Shade Tree Commission Discusses Tree Removal for Church Project and Ongoing Urban Forestry Challenges.

The Ocean Shade Tree Commission meeting focused on significant upcoming tree removals for a church project on Asbury Avenue and broader concerns about urban forestry management, including utility pruning, historical site preservation, and community engagement strategies. The commission addressed the impending removal of approximately 300 trees, primarily small evergreen pines, to make way for construction related to a new French-speaking church. This project, pending zoning board approval, highlighted the township’s challenges with balancing development and environmental preservation.

16:46The church project will involve several trees being removed, raising concerns about ecological impact and community compliance with construction regulations. The commission noted that plans are in place for the church to plant new trees after the project concludes. However, the current condition of the land, with overgrown areas and poison ivy, drew attention. This conversation led to a broader discussion about enforcing construction fines and ensuring compliance, with the suggestion that new construction permits could be contingent on settling outstanding fines. This proposal received positive feedback as a potential method to improve adherence to regulations.

Tree management efforts at the local golf course were also reviewed, with reports indicating positive results from ongoing maintenance programs that addressed hazard trees and improved the course’s appearance. The commission expressed satisfaction with the pruning and fertilization efforts, which were credited with enhancing the course’s visual appeal.

0:05Another topic was the utility company JCP&L’s annual circuit trimming, which commenced earlier in the week. A total of 13 trees, deemed dead or beyond recovery, were marked for removal from Pound Road west to the township limits. Concerns were raised about the township’s overall tree canopy and the implications of removing these trees. The commission discussed the utility company’s process for recommending tree removal versus pruning, noting the need for transparency and accountability. The dialogue emphasized the necessity of maintaining a record of removed trees to advocate effectively for planting new ones.

16:46A recurring theme was the need for better documentation and understanding of historical sites associated with tree removals. The commission acknowledged the loss of historical context when trees are merely recorded as stumps and highlighted the importance of updating the Tree Keeper system to reflect all removals accurately.

33:08The commission explored potential funding avenues for tree initiatives, including grants from the Department of Environmental Protection for developing a forestry management plan. A financial report for a recent grant was accepted, although there was a mix-up regarding a $5,000 allocation for supplies, which required additional township funding. The commission plans to revise the existing Community Forestry Management Plan to align with current needs and regulations up to 2025, incorporating community input as required by the new standards.

Concerns about specific tree species were addressed, particularly regarding locust trees and non-native species like the invasive Norway maple. The commission plans to replace dead cherry trees in Colonial Terrace Park and explore the use of native species such as Eastern red cedar for future plantings. There was a strong emphasis on the importance of using native species to maintain ecological balance and prevent the spread of invasive trees.

Community engagement was a focal point, with plans to distribute a tree management survey through various channels, including schools, the township website, and newsletters. The commission is also considering engaging students in tree planting initiatives, particularly around Arbor Day and Earth Day, to foster environmental stewardship from a young age.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: