A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to the increasing number of tree removal permits, particularly as spring ushers in a rise in construction activities like swimming pool installations. One noteworthy project involved the proposed removal of 300 trees from three single-family lots on Sherman Street. However, permits were denied due to incomplete submissions, highlighting the project’s substantial impact on the local environment. The areas in question have been neglected for over three decades, prompting discussions on the necessity of maximizing tree preservation and contributions to the shade tree fund.

The commission was briefed on ongoing line clearance work, which had resulted in the removal of numerous hazardous trees. Additionally, a new control method for tackling the beach leaf beetle, threatening American beech trees, was shared.

Attention shifted to the trees marked with red tape along South Edge Avenue, sparking concern over communication lapses. The commission learned that multiple entities were unaware of the tree markings, raising questions about the provisional permit filed by JCP&L with the Department of Environmental Protection. The commission underscored the necessity for transparency and accurate information regarding the status and future of these trees.

In another agenda item, the commission discussed the planned replacement of a bridge at the end of Corley’s Road, connecting Ocean Township to Allenhurst. This project, identified as bridge number 012, necessitated tree removals to address erosion issues. Discussions included Allenhurst’s preference for burying a high-voltage subtransmission line, a point of contention in the planning process. The project’s timeline anticipated a public announcement within three to four months, with construction slated to commence at least a year later.

Tracking and managing tree removal and replacement emerged as a issue, with current reporting systems described as inefficient. The commission expressed frustration over the lack of automatic data extraction capabilities, which complicated efforts to ensure compliance with tree preservation ordinances. Discussions suggested potential improvements, such as using photographs and historical imagery to verify tree coverage but highlighted doubts about their reliability.

The commission’s community engagement initiatives included plans for a survey to solicit feedback on tree planting locations. Efforts focused on ensuring the survey’s accessibility across diverse community languages, despite resource constraints. A promotional video, featuring local students, underscored the environmental benefits of tree planting and encouraged community involvement.

A tree giveaway event was scheduled for April 27 at the senior center, where 300 seedling trees would be distributed with the help of the local garden club. The commission detailed the types of trees to be given away and discussed best practices for planting and protecting young trees from deer. Concerns about the survival rates of previously distributed trees prompted considerations for improved planting strategies.

The meeting also covered the commission’s forestry management plan, due by the year’s end. Two proposals from qualified arborists were reviewed, with a preference emerging for Sterling’s more comprehensive and cost-effective proposal. The commission expressed the importance of timely submission of the management plan and engaged in discussions on potential funding sources.

Lastly, the commission celebrated the longstanding tradition of distributing trees to third-grade students. Coordination with the recreation department was underway for the upcoming event, with emphasis placed on involving families and promoting the positive community impact of tree planting initiatives.