The most discussion centered around an application to convert an existing non-conforming building, previously used as a cabinet shop, into a single-family residence within the R4 zone. The project architect outlined plans to eliminate the non-conforming use and proposed a two-story addition to the structure, which would include a master bedroom suite and additional bedrooms. However, family changes led to amendments in the plans, such as converting a bedroom into an exercise area and leaving another as unfinished attic space, resulting in a reduction of the house’s size by 610 square feet. A board member expressed skepticism about a deed restriction intended to prevent future uses other than single-family residency, questioning the applicant’s intentions regarding the attic space. This discussion led to a consensus that the application should be postponed to allow the applicant to present more definitive plans.

Another topic involved a proposal for consolidating two lots in the R4 zone, featuring a property identified as lot 26, which was under the 10,000 square feet requirement. The proposal included plans to expand an existing vacant structure by moving it closer to the street, adding a second floor, and constructing covered porches. Testimony was provided by a licensed engineer and an architect, focusing on efforts to balance impervious coverage and manage stormwater through a roof leader recharge system. Concerns from neighboring residents about drainage impacts were addressed, with assurances provided about the effectiveness of the drainage solutions.

The board also reviewed an application from Sam Gabby, who sought to retain air conditioning condensers placed 27 feet from Mammoth Road, falling short of the required 30-foot setback. The board expressed reservations about the lack of photographic evidence to assess the visibility and impact of the condensers. The application was deferred to the next meeting, with a request for Gabby to provide photographic evidence.

In another case, applicant Neoto Poto requested a variance for a front porch built within the front yard setback on Delaware Avenue. The porch was part of renovations to a pre-existing non-conforming structure. The board approved the application, recognizing the porch’s role in enhancing neighborhood appeal and fostering community interaction.

A further application from Two Texas Avenue LLC sought to convert a commercial-style building into a single-family residence, requiring multiple variances due to the property’s irregular shape and existing non-conformities. The applicant’s attorney argued that the conversion from industrial to residential use would benefit the area, but the board sought further clarity on the variances and the project’s impact.