The most pressing discussion revolved around the application by Irene Shore for a variance related to an in-ground pool on Northwoods Drive. Shore sought approval for a change in the existing grade to resolve a minor height discrepancy that was preventing the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The board scrutinized the grading difference of five inches, which violated the zoning ordinance by exceeding the permissible grade change of two feet. Despite the discrepancy, engineers and board members agreed that the impact was minor, given the small affected area. Shore had worked with an engineer to ensure compliance and expressed frustration over the obstacles created by the property’s steep terrain. However, the board moved towards a resolution, acknowledging that the grading issue was confined to a small section and did not encroach on neighboring properties. The board ultimately approved the variance, recognizing Shore’s efforts to comply with township regulations and the practical challenges posed by the site’s topography.

In contrast, the application by 55 WPR Holdings LLC for a new residential structure on Wanamasa Point Road sparked debate. The board examined the proposed demolition of an existing home and garage to construct a 2.5-story dwelling with an attached garage. The property, undersized and located in a high-density zone, presented several challenges. Board members and the public expressed concerns about the significant reduction in front and side yard setbacks, with the proposed plan reducing the front yard setback to 5.99 feet from Wanamasa Point Road, a sharp decrease from the existing 41.7 feet. The narrow lot also necessitated creative solutions for parking, given the limited space and the need to accommodate three parking spaces. The discussions involved potential adjustments to the garage dimensions to ensure compliance with parking requirements and mitigate congestion concerns.

The board also addressed issues concerning air conditioning units and noise pollution, particularly given the proximity to neighboring homes. Discussions focused on the potential noise impact of the units and the need for proper screening. Concerns about drainage and the impact of tree removal were also raised. The board emphasized the need for clarity in the property’s design intentions, particularly regarding the classification of attic space and the potential for misuse as a bedroom, which would affect parking requirements.

Further complications arose from the property’s location within a flood zone, with part of the site affected by flood hazard regulations. The board requested additional consultations to address waterproofing concerns and ensure compliance with safety standards. Questions about the property’s existing sewer system capacity were deferred for further review, with the board seeking input from the township engineer to address potential infrastructure impacts.

The board acknowledged these concerns, deciding to revisit the proposal in a subsequent meeting to allow for further examination of the issues raised.