The commission focused on the proposed citywide golf cart program, which had been under discussion since a previous meeting. The program aims to allow golf carts on certain city roads, requiring a review of road safety and related costs. Chief Ogburn detailed the program, noting specific speed limits and safety requirements for both golf carts and low-speed vehicles. A map was presented, showing neighborhoods and roads eligible for golf cart use. The estimated cost for necessary signage was approximately $3,933, and the staff confirmed that personnel costs were within the existing budget.

Concerns were raised about safety, especially regarding the potential for teenagers to operate golf carts without valid licenses. The commission discussed the need for a public education campaign to ensure residents understand the rules governing golf cart use. There was consensus on drafting an ordinance to formally establish the program, with a focus on safety and enforcement strategies.

The commission also addressed ongoing issues related to storm damage recovery. A motion was unanimously passed to waive building permit fees for 90 days, alleviating financial burdens for residents affected by recent storms. An update on debris collection efforts revealed that the city had contracted FEMA-approved debris haulers to manage the substantial amounts of storm debris. The city staff expressed satisfaction with the progress made in debris management, despite some residents perceiving the process as slow.

Another topic was the amendment of residency requirements for candidates seeking election as Mayor or City Commissioner. The proposed ordinance would require candidates to undergo a background check to verify residency, with the qualifying period set for December. A commissioner expressed support for the one-year residency requirement but raised concerns about its constitutionality, citing Supreme Court cases related to the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. The commission acknowledged the need to navigate these legal considerations carefully to ensure alignment with constitutional principles.

Property transactions also generated discussion, particularly regarding a 0.14-acre property involved in the Taylor Street reconstruction project. The city opted to accept an unsolicited offer to avoid the costs associated with eminent domain proceedings. Concerns were raised about the lack of a competitive bid process, and residents expressed dissatisfaction with the transparency of property transactions. One resident voiced frustration over the perceived lack of options in city planning processes, calling for more comprehensive public engagement.

The meeting also included a public hearing about a land agreement to sell city-owned property. The assistant city manager explained the background of the properties and the unanimous vote to proceed with the contract. Some residents questioned the decision to avoid a competitive bid process and raised concerns about the city’s broader development objectives. The commission defended the decision, noting the urgency and cost implications of eminent domain.