The most discussion of the evening centered around the potential contract extension for Superintendent David Cittadino. The board was divided over whether to offer a one-year or two-year extension. One member argued for a two-year extension to ensure stability and allow ample time for a thorough search for a successor, if needed. Another member expressed that the board’s lack of recent evaluations made the decision complex, stating the importance of evaluating Cittadino based on his current role rather than past decisions as a principal. The debate was fueled by differing opinions on Cittadino’s past administrative choices, with one member recalling a controversial hiring decision that was perceived as a political appointment. Despite these tensions, some members acknowledged the need for a balanced assessment of Cittadino’s contributions and potential future impacts on the district.

In a related discussion, the board addressed the evaluation process for the superintendent, facilitated by a representative from the New Jersey School Boards Association. The process was outlined as a two-step procedure requiring completion by July 1 each year. It was noted that the board was in the midst of reviewing compiled evaluations.

Another topic was the annual testing report, which provided insights into student progress in standardized assessments. The report highlighted that over 2,000 students participated in the recent PSAT administration, with improvements noted in SAT scores and Advanced Placement exam results. However, challenges were identified in mathematics performance as students transition to middle school, with COVID-19 disruptions impacting testing dynamics. The presentation also covered the Dynamic Learning Maps assessment for students with disabilities, revealing areas needing improvement in language arts for younger students.

Community engagement was a focal point during the public comments segment, where concerns were raised about inclusivity and student safety. A speaker appealed for the board to recognize cultural festivals like Eid and Diwali as official school holidays, advocating for unity and inclusivity. Another community member addressed safety concerns, citing a high number of reported assaults on staff and urging the board to enhance safety measures. The board was also commended for their participation in a recent convention and encouraged to apply insights gained for community benefit.

Special education funding was another issue, with correspondence from the Special Education Parent Teacher Association (SEPTA) highlighting the lack of Unified programs and clubs, impacting approximately 1,500 students with disabilities. The board faced criticism for not allocating funds to these programs despite grant cuts from Special Olympics. This echoed broader concerns about the district’s financial management and resource allocation, with discussions on recent property sales and their implications for the budget.