The board granted a variance for a homeowner, Salvatore Tineri, to construct a covered front porch. Tineri and Patricia Tineri were sworn in to discuss the application, which included details about the porch’s intended use for relaxation and holiday decoration, as well as a practical function for snow protection. A board member noted the similarity of this request to others previously granted and mentioned that the porch would integrate well with the neighborhood. The board concluded that the porch would not only improve the appearance of the Tineri home but also offer benefits to the community.

Another discussion emerged around an applicant who installed a driveway and patio without the necessary permits. As a first-time homeowner, the applicant claimed they were unaware of the requirement for such permits. They also highlighted the practical benefits of the changes, including the prevention of water ingress into their basement. The zoning officer provided insight into the variances required and spoke about the setback requirements from property lines. Concerns about potential stormwater runoff to adjacent properties were raised, prompting the suggestion that an engineering assessment might be better suited to address the issue. The board deferred its decision on this application, emphasizing the importance of adherence to zoning laws and the acquisition of appropriate permits for property modifications.

Further, the board reviewed a property owner’s driveway and fencing improvements, which they stated improved water flow and drainage. Board members deliberated on whether a design waiver was warranted for the property’s setbacks. One member expressed reservations about the patio’s closeness to the driveway and potential misuse as a parking area. The board ultimately approved the design waiver and a C2 variance, subject to conditions that included preventing parking on the patio and mitigating any future drainage issues.

During the public portion of the meeting, a member of the public broached concerns regarding the conduct of a zoning board member. However, the chairman redirected the issue to the township council.

The meeting concluded with the acknowledgement of several adjournments for upcoming applications, which encompassed major preliminary and final site plans with variances for apartment and warehouse expansions. Additionally, the board announced the swearing-in of the zoning officer and set the date for the next meeting before adjourning.