NVR Inc.’s proposal to expand the size of previously approved decks from 8 by 10 feet to 10 by 20.5 feet sparked debate among the Zoning Board members. The larger deck sizes were presented as a response to an increased demand for more outdoor space by homeowners. Variances were sought to exceed the standard 55% impervious coverage and to allow construction closer to property lines, raising questions about the uniformity of design across the development and potential privacy issues for adjoining lots.

The discussion extended to the design of affordable housing units within the development. The Zoning Board contemplated the inclusion of patios for these units and the feasibility of maintaining a consistent aesthetic across all properties. A land development manager from Ryan Homes weighed in on the practicality and preference for adding patios to affordable units, while the board deliberated on the potential cost implications.

The placement of patios and decks became a central theme, particularly the comparison between a 10×10 patio on a market-rate home (Lot 19) and the adjacent affordable home (Lot 31), which might result in a larger yard with a smaller landing. A planner provided testimony that variance relief could be granted without significant detriment to the public good or the zone plan, emphasizing market flexibility. However, concerns were raised about the fairness of differing patio and deck options for various homes, with some board members questioning the potential privacy implications and the necessity for uniform deck sizes for all affordable units.

Residents’ concerns were also a focal point during the meeting, with one of the prominent issues being the impact of proposed deck constructions on privacy and quality of life. A homeowner association representative questioned the need for additional variances and the potential height of the decks. The board addressed these concerns by ensuring that the decks would be of a standard height and that the variances aimed to provide uniformity for future homeowners. The board also considered the implications of granting variances for lot coverage and impervious surfaces on a subset of lots, discussing the importance of consistency across the development.

A resident, Gregory WLAN, brought attention to potential drainage issues exacerbated by the proposed expansion of the decks. He explained that land clearing had altered water flow, affecting properties downhill. The board responded by affirming that building dimensions would remain unchanged, with only deck sizes being extended. The discussion also touched on the prospect of future variances for residents wishing to extend their decks and the grading of the properties to mitigate any water runoff concerns.