Old Tappan Council Wrestles with Affordable Housing Mandates and Fire Department Challenges

In a recent Old Tappan Borough Council meeting, discussions centered around the borough’s affordable housing obligations, the challenges facing the fire department, and community engagement in local projects. The council addressed state-mandated affordable housing requirements, debated the financial and operational burdens on the fire department, and considered revisions to local policies to better serve the community.

17:57One notable issues discussed was the borough’s affordable housing obligations as mandated by the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The borough’s planner, John Zabo, reviewed the calculations and reduced the land capacity based on factors such as the non-developable nature of certain properties. The council passed a resolution requiring the borough attorney to file a declaratory judgment complaint within 48 hours of adoption. This move would allow the borough to assert its position regarding its affordable housing obligations. The council acknowledged the complexities of these obligations, highlighting that any interested party, including developers or citizen groups, could challenge the numbers until February 28. Despite these challenges, the council expressed confidence in Zabo’s calculations and sought to clarify the borough’s position by effectively communicating their disagreement with the state’s figures.

0:03A council member noted the long-term commitment required, as the fourth round of obligations spans from 2025 to 2035. There was a strong emphasis on the need for ongoing planning efforts, particularly related to the master plan and how to incorporate the affordable housing numbers within it. Discussions revealed changes in rules regarding bonus credits for certain types of developments, complicating the council’s strategy to meet their obligations. The council agreed that while they are committed to providing their fair share of four rehabilitative units and 121 prospective units, they would pursue adjustments based on local conditions as part of the housing plan.

34:06Another focal point of the meeting was the condition of the fire department’s 43 engine, which requires extensive repairs. The engine, although still able to pump water, lacks scene lights and the ability to produce electricity. Repairs for the cabinet door alone are estimated at over $4,000 due to the vehicle’s age, while generator repairs could cost over $99,000. The council discussed the financial implications of continued repairs, especially with new fire trucks costing between $850,000 and $1 million. The fire department’s Chief suggested exploring alternative options for repairs, such as finding used parts, given the significant investment required for a new truck.

Additionally, the council addressed the safety concerns surrounding snow-covered fire hydrants, urging residents to help clear snow from around hydrants near their homes. The fire department has been proactive, completing their yearly SCBA refresher training and scheduling a Hazmat awareness refresher course. The council also requested the fire department forward their budget and capital requests, which had not yet been submitted.

In recreational news, the winter basketball season was off to a strong start, with preparations underway for the spring softball and baseball seasons. However, there was an acknowledgment of an ongoing umpire shortage, and efforts were being made to address this challenge. The council noted a resignation from the Recreation Commission, with Mike Demarco stepping down after years of volunteer service. His contributions to various town events were recognized, and there are candidates eager to fill the vacancy. Proposed revisions to the field usage policy were also discussed.

1:03:55The council further engaged in a courtesy review process for municipal projects, allowing for public comments on projects constructed on public land without needing planning board approval. Concerns were raised about past projects, such as the police department and DPW buildings, which were constructed without going before the planning board, leading to resident dissatisfaction due to a lack of awareness.

Environmental issues were also a point of contention, particularly regarding a significant data center project in the neighboring Orangetown area. The council expressed intent to write resolutions opposing the second phase of this project, which would add another 40-megawatt facility close to residential areas, creating noise disturbances. The council discussed potential outreach efforts to local and state representatives to assist in voicing residents’ concerns.

Efforts to become a veteran-friendly municipality were reviewed, with the council noting the requirements already met, such as maintaining a veteran workforce and providing discounts for veterans. However, some requirements related to business initiatives remain unmet. The council discussed the possibility of reaching out to the Northern Valley Chamber of Commerce to promote veteran-owned businesses in the bidding process for municipal contracts.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: