0:00Turner’s presentation revealed that Olmsted County experienced a turnout of approximately 91,500 votes in the recent general election, mirroring the 2020 figures. However, a growing voter registration base resulted in a slightly lower percentage turnout, at 84%, compared to the state average of 76%. As absentee voting grows, with a surge from 23% to 37% of total ballots, the county’s election team has faced mounting pressures, especially in the final weeks before the election. Turner detailed how the demand for absentee ballots increased significantly, resulting in a substantial workload for election staff, who often worked nearly 80 hours a week to manage the influx.

The county’s election infrastructure also underwent rigorous testing, with 55,800 ballots evaluated without errors. Despite low public turnout at the October 15 public accuracy test, it attracted considerable media attention. Turner acknowledged the vital contributions of the election staff, particularly a new election manager, Amanda Kefir, who swiftly adapted to her role during this demanding period.

14:26Discussion during the meeting also addressed the accessibility of absentee voting, particularly for immigrant communities. Officials noted that while absentee ballots are mailed to those registered as permanent absentee voters, they can still vote in person if they do not return their ballots. This flexibility aims to accommodate last-minute decisions and concerns about timing. However, challenges persist for non-English speaking voters, prompting outreach to organizations like the League of Women Voters to improve assistance for these communities.

Positive feedback from commissioners about the voting process efficiency was shared, highlighting the dedication and preparedness of the election staff. Despite these successes, concerns were raised about the integrity of the absentee voting process, particularly in light of recent issues in nearby jurisdictions. It was confirmed that Olmsted County maintains strict control over its absentee ballots.

In addition to election matters, the meeting covered the Destination Medical Center (DMC) initiatives, focusing on newly approved funding for historic district projects in Rochester. These projects include housing activation, roof replacements, and mechanical upgrades, with up to 50% of costs covered by DMC funding. The discussions touched on the potential use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for housing related to DMC projects, a topic of some debate regarding legislative intent and authority.

Solid waste management efforts were also on the agenda, with a recent meeting with District 10 highlighting the need for unified advocacy in light of upcoming capital improvement projects for waste-to-energy facilities. Plans to draft an op-ed and pursue state funding for these initiatives were discussed as part of a broader effort to enhance regional waste management strategies.