The council meeting began with a heated public forum where residents criticized the city’s tax rate, reportedly the highest among 21 taxing authorities. Roger Wellis initiated the discussion by questioning the rationale behind the steep tax increase, especially when other communities were lowering or modestly increasing their taxes. He expressed frustration over inadequate municipal services, citing a lack of patrol presence in his neighborhood. Kevin Cardel echoed these sentiments, reporting an increase in his property taxes and questioning the city’s priorities. Jeff Barner, a newer resident, shared his alarm over the projected tax increases, which he claimed might force his family to relocate due to financial constraints.

Amidst public concerns about rising taxes, Joy Binger, recognized as the Outstanding Citizen for 2024, expressed gratitude to the council for efforts to reduce budgetary demands. However, she also highlighted the potential cuts to the Economic Development Authority (EDA), urging the council to maintain its funding. The public forum underscored widespread dissatisfaction with the rising taxes and the perceived lack of corresponding improvements in city services or infrastructure.

The council then grappled with various financial matters, including budget allocations and staffing needs. A notable topic was the forensic audit proposed to address financial discrepancies within the fire department. The audit was prompted by concerns over unaccounted funds, with $154,000 reportedly contributed by the fire department and $63,000 by First Responders remaining unresolved. This proposal led to a broader discussion about the implications of utilizing tax money for the audit, with some members expressing skepticism about the effectiveness of the current auditing firm.

Additionally, the meeting addressed the hiring challenges in the public works department and the wastewater treatment facility. The need for a Class A operator was emphasized, though it was acknowledged that finding qualified personnel would require a higher salary range of $35 to $50 per hour. The council considered training existing staff to manage the facility’s complex systems, highlighting the urgency of resolving staffing shortages before the current contract expires.

Budget discussions also touched on the allocation of funds for snow and ice removal. A motion was made to reduce the budget line for snow removal from $50,000 to $40,000, based on historical data of previous expenditures. The debate included differing opinions on whether to maintain a higher budget line, with some advocating for a more conservative approach to prevent unnecessary taxation.

Further, the council considered a potential ordinance regulating cannabis and hemp businesses. The proposed ordinance aimed to clarify the city’s regulatory authority over cannabis-related activities, incorporating state-mandated buffer zones to limit the proximity of these businesses to schools and daycares. The council discussed the complexities involved in balancing business growth with community safety and compliance with state law.

A review of the Economic Development Authority (EDA) funding revealed differing opinions on its necessity. While some members argued for maintaining the EDA’s funding due to its role in grant writing and community engagement, others questioned its value.

The meeting concluded with discussions on various operational matters, including the transfer of funds from the Wastewater budget to the sanitary sewer collection budget, the need for new equipment for the Public Works department, and staffing adjustments. The council also touched on the importance of transparency in handling unemployment claims and the hiring process for city positions.