Central to the LDC revisions is the introduction of a new zoning district, R1C, intended for neighborhoods with narrower lots, and a mixed-use zoning district to facilitate diverse development scenarios. The update also includes provisions for a shared parking model in mixed-use developments, which seeks to optimize space by reducing parking requirements based on usage patterns throughout the day. The council discussed the implications of these changes, particularly the potential for increased flexibility and integration within the community.

Signage regulations were another focal point, with the council considering revisions to the sign code. The proposals included clarifications on sign area calculations and the introduction of wayfinding signs that would not count against the overall copy area. There was a debate over projecting signs, with concerns about competition for visibility among tenants. Staff proposed limitations on size and projection to ensure fairness and maintain the character of the area. This sparked differing opinions among council members about balancing business visibility with aesthetic standards.

Parking requirements for developments seeking density bonuses also generated discussion. The council considered whether to maintain minimum parking standards or allow market forces to dictate availability. Some members expressed skepticism about the necessity of parking minimums, while others emphasized the need for adequate spaces.

The meeting also addressed the contentious issue of allowing bars in mixed-use zones. Staff suggested bars be permitted as a special exception in targeted areas, but there was a split among council members about the fairness of these requirements. Some argued for a more liberal approach, allowing bars by right in certain areas to foster business growth, while others called for continued oversight through special exceptions to preserve community character.

In addition, the council considered the impact of proposed LDC amendments on small business owners. There was a push to minimize obstacles for these businesses, particularly in intense commercial zones like C2. Public input revealed concerns about expanding bars outside the downtown core, with residents like Steven Shank advocating for development within designated areas to maintain a community-focused atmosphere.

Beyond the Land Development Code discussions, the council reviewed resolutions related to state and federal lobbying services. The intent was to secure funding for local projects, though concerns were raised about the efficacy and necessity of these services given the upcoming election and potential shifts in political dynamics.