The most pressing topic of the meeting was the proposed resolution to increase stormwater and potable water rates. The resolution, identified as number 4559-25, aims to address operational and capital plans over a ten-year period with a “pay-as-you-go” funding approach for future projects. The proposal includes a 25% rate increase effective February 1, followed by another 25% hike on October 1, with smaller increases projected in subsequent years. The council emphasized that these adjustments are important for meeting the city’s cash reserve targets and funding an extensive capital improvement program, projected at approximately $43 million over the next decade.

Public comments played a role in the council’s deliberations. Charles Zuber voiced concerns over the steep increases in stormwater costs, pointing out that they outpace the rise in Social Security benefits, potentially burdening residents. Karen Harriet from the Conservation Board urged the council to focus on water conservation. Jennifer Webb highlighted the capacity issues at the current water plant, which operates at 90% capacity, posing risks during heavy rainfall events.

Council members acknowledged these concerns, with one member expressing discomfort over the proposed rate hikes but affirming the necessity of the water plant project. They noted that the city is nearing its maximum water extraction limits and that improvements are essential for future resilience. Another council member inquired about whether the stormwater plan encompassed both new projects and ongoing operations and maintenance, receiving confirmation that it did.

The discussion also touched on the financial implications of advanced water treatment, estimated to cost $50.7 million with an annual operating cost increase of $2 million. A proposal was made to approve the water rates for the first two years while seeking more data on water usage, particularly in mixed-use housing developments, before issuing bonds to fund the improvements.

The council also tackled the renewal of the city’s Microsoft Enterprise agreement. The agreement, renewed through CDW-G, spans three years at a cost of $449,999. Questions arose about the necessity of purchasing 3,990 licenses for just 38 employees, with clarification provided that the licenses cover approximately 360 computers used by full-time and temporary staff, interns, and part-time help.

In addition to these discussions, the council reviewed amendments to smoke and sign regulations. Proposed changes to smoke regulations included prohibiting emissions in all zoning districts, except for single-family residences with fireplaces. Amendments to sign regulations focused on political signage on city property, proposing exceptions for election days and setting a maximum sign size of six square feet.

The council also evaluated the city’s legal services, exploring whether to continue with in-house attorneys or to outsource services. The city attorney emphasized the importance of council input on drafting documents for this process. The council expressed a preference for a competitive selection process that balances cost with experience and efficiency.

Notable mentions included a police department awards banquet, upcoming city events, and the city’s efforts in recognizing Black History Month. The mayor proposed revisions to water rate structures to incentivize conservation.