The meeting commenced with the re-election of Dave Axel as the chairman of the Oviedo Community Redevelopment Agency. After a brief nomination process, Axel received four votes, securing his leadership role for another term. Meanwhile, the position of vice chair was filled by Deputy Mayor Tuer, who was the sole nominee and thus appointed by default.

One notable matter discussed was the approval of Resolution 6125, which outlined an intergovernmental agreement between the Oviedo Community Redevelopment Agency and the City of Oviedo for the Oviedo Connector Road Project. This project is vital for the city’s development, encompassing the construction of a road from 434 to Geneva Drive, a new lift station, and a pedestrian bridge. However, initial bids for the project exceeded the agency’s budget, necessitating a review of funding options.

To bridge the financial gap, the agency explored reallocating funds from the city’s sewer impact fee account. This account was deemed an appropriate source due to the lift station project’s role in expanding capacity, which aligns with the purpose of the sewer impact fees. This strategic reallocation allows the agency to fund the road and pedestrian bridge components of the project while utilizing the sewer impact fees for the lift station.

The financial implications of these reallocations were a focal point, with a detailed budget impact table presented to the agency. The discussion involved clarifying the function of Wastewater Capital Recovery Charges, which are developer-paid impact fees for sewer system capacity. It was confirmed that these charges will not affect existing user rates but will be applied to new developments or expansions.

Attention then turned to the intricacies of relocating the lift station, a necessity due to the road project’s requirements. This led to questions about compliance with statute 409 and whether the costs of moving existing infrastructure could be covered within this framework. The project’s scope, including the larger lift station, requires complete relocation, prompting a discussion on whether the associated pipe-moving costs should be included.

The cost of constructing the pedestrian bridge was another topic of concern. The bridge, part of an overall infrastructure enhancement plan, carries a price tag of $400,000. Despite its seemingly high cost, the bridge construction includes landscaping and paver work, aligning with Solari Park’s aesthetics. Regulatory requirements, including FEMA’s floodway regulations, further contribute to the project’s expenses. Some members expressed skepticism over the cost, comparing it to residential construction prices, but the consensus underscored the bridge’s necessity for connecting the park to the road.

As the meeting concluded, members emphasized the urgency of proceeding with the infrastructure projects to avoid potential cost increases from delays. The agency moved forward with a vote, confirming the proposed plans and budget adjustments.

The meeting wrapped up with a brief discussion on scheduling future meetings, taking into account members’ availability and avoiding national holidays. This pragmatic approach ensures the continued, effective operation of the agency as it navigates the complexities of urban development and fiscal management.