Oviedo Plans Mobility Overhaul with New Fee Structure

The Oviedo City Council meeting revolved around a update to the Mobility plan and the introduction of a new Mobility fee structure, aimed at transforming the city’s transportation landscape over the next two decades. The proposed Mobility plan and fee are designed to prioritize a multimodal transportation system that includes walking, bicycling, transit, and driving with a focus on safety, lower speeds, and accessibility. The meeting delved into the details of these proposals, discussing potential impacts on residential and commercial developments, the negotiation of fee-sharing with the county, and the scheduling of public workshops for community input.

Jonathan Paul, the consultant, presented the comprehensive Mobility plan, which encompasses roadway and intersection projects, pathways, and sidewalks with the goal of zero deaths. It is set to replace current transportation concurrency, proportionate share, and impact fees. The plan also introduces a Mobility fee to fund multimodal projects, which would be a one-time payment by new developments to mitigate their transportation impact. The fee includes considerations for extraordinary circumstances under Florida statute, requiring an additional $35,000 to finalize the process, including work sessions before adoption.

The Mobility fee’s calculation was based on a larger study area to replace the county fee, potentially funding projects even outside city limits in collaboration with the county. The fees for residential units were discussed, with a focus on affordable housing, multifamily residential units, and the basis for assessing fees, which could consider square footage and a cap based on property size. The discussion also covered the potential increase in fees for mobile home parks by 97%, reflecting changes in the trip generation manual. Community-serving facilities, long-term care facilities, and private education could see fee increases of 45%, 24%, and 14%, respectively.

The potential inclusion of fees for charging stations associated with retail businesses sparked a debate, with the need for further clarification on their assessment. Phasing in the new fees over two to four years was presented as an option, considering the percentage increase. Council members inquired about the rationale behind the fee changes, the impact on specific business models, and the assessment of fees for modifications to existing commercial structures.

The concept of extraordinary circumstances was a focal point, discussing the potential adoption of the full fee at once, instead of phasing it in. The potential impact of this decision and the process involved were debated, including legislation that could affect city and county negotiations and the need for public workshops to review the findings and the fee itself. The discussion touched on the need to follow the same public notice process as for any code revision and the inclusion of affordable housing, small business retail, and mixed-use development within the fee structure.

Negotiations with the county regarding an interlocal agreement for sharing mobility fees were also discussed. The council’s study suggested a 25% fee share with the county, but the county was adamant about receiving the entire fee. The need for an interlocal agreement to address this was stressed, and a discussion on the notice requirement for opting out of the county ordinance ensued. The criteria for providing discounts for mixed-use developments were debated, with different views on whether to designate specific geographic areas or to evaluate on a case-by-case basis.

Additionally, the logistics of scheduling public workshops to present the plan and the ordinance were discussed, as well as the possibility of canceling the council meeting scheduled during spring break due to members’ unavailability. There were contrasting opinions on whether to proceed with the meeting if there was an agenda.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.
Megan Sladek
City Council Officials:
Bob Pollack, Keith Britton, Jeff Boddiford, Natalie Teuchert

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country:

Meeting Date
Filter by bodytypes
Agricultural Advisory Committee
Airport Advisory Board
Art and Culture Board
Beach Committee
Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Board of Elections
Board of Health
Borough Council
Building Committee
Cannabis Control Board
Cemetery Commission
Charter Revision Commission
Child and Family Services Board
City Council
City Identity Committee
Code Enforcement Board
College Board of Trustees
Community Appearance Board
Community Preservation Committee
Community Redevelopment Agency
County Council
Disability Advisory Committee
Economic Development Board
Elderly Affairs Board
Electric Advisory Board
Environmental Commission
Financial Oversight Board
Historic Preservation Commission
Housing Authority
Human Relations Committee
Human Resources Committee
Insurance Fund
Land Use Board
Library Board
Licensing Board
Mental Health Commission
Municipal Alliance
Open Space Commission
Oversight and Review Committee
Parking Authority
Parks and Gardens Commission
Parks Commission
Pension Board
Planning Board
Police Review Board
Property Assessment Board
Public Safety Committee
Recreation Commission
Redevelopment Agency
Rent Control Board
Rent Leveling Board
School Board
Sewerage Authority
Shade Tree Commission
Special Magistrate
Taxation & Revenue Advisory Committee
Tourism Board
Trails Committee
Transportation Board
Utility Board
Value Adjustment Board
Veterans Committee
Water Control Board
Women's Advisory Committee
Youth Advisory Committee
Zoning Board
Filter by County
Bay County
Bradford County
Brevard County
Broward County
Clay County
Duval County
Escambia County
Gulf County
Hendry County
Highlands County
Hillsborough County
Indian River County
Lake County
Lee County
Leon County
Levy County
Liberty County
Manatee County
Marion County
Martin County
Miami-Dade County
Monroe County
Okaloosa County
Orange County
Osceola County
Palm Beach County
Pasco County
Pinellas County
Polk County
Putnam County
Santa Rosa County
Sarasota County
Seminole County
St. Johns County
Taylor County
Volusia County
Walton County
Barnstable County
Berkshire County
Bristol County
Essex County
Franklin County
Hampden County
Hampshire County
Middlesex County
Norfolk County
Plymouth County
Suffolk County
Worcester County
Atlantic County
Bergen County
Burlington County
Camden County
Cape May County
Cumberland County
Essex County
Gloucester County
Hudson County
Hunterdon County
Mercer County
Middlesex County
Monmouth County
Morris County
Ocean County
Passaic County
Somerset County
Sussex County
Union County
Warren County
Filter by sourcetypes