The meeting began with the city attorney providing an update on ongoing discussions with the FAA concerning a complex airport transaction. The attorney highlighted discrepancies in previous appraisals conducted by Cookie and Associates, specifically regarding acreage and valuation. This issue necessitated amendments to existing contracts, with efforts led by individuals such as Kelly Douglas, Jeremy Alexander, and Jeff Nations to extend the contract’s closing date. Optimism was expressed about finalizing the transaction by June 1st, as a draft purchase and sale agreement had been sent to the FAA’s closing agent.

Significant emphasis was placed on the future of the old terminal building and its potential impact on the growing flight school. A point of discussion was the need for additional space for the school, which could potentially be resolved with a modular building. The airport manager was tasked with exploring options for acquiring such a building, with cost estimates ranging from $48,000 for used units to $75,000 for new ones.

The board acknowledged the importance of maintaining good relationships with airport users, such as the flight school, and ensuring their operational needs are met. Various locations for the modular building were identified, taking into account customer access and parking considerations. However, a issue arose regarding the availability of restroom facilities, which were deemed essential for any new construction. It was suggested that if a modular building is sourced from the school system, it must include these amenities to avoid past negotiation hurdles.

Discussion also centered around the right of first refusal for the old terminal building, which Mr. Russ held based on previous agreements. If he accepted the offer, the airport would need to negotiate with Jeff Nations regarding space utilization. The airport manager emphasized the importance of using standard lease formats for consistency.

The collaborative efforts of the advisory board and stakeholders, including Mr. Nations and his team, were highlighted by a representative who spoke on behalf of Nations. This representative underscored the importance of a “win-win” outcome and expressed concerns about an email chain suggesting a backtrack on prior agreements. The representative reiterated the commitment to a constructive relationship with the board, focusing on the flight school’s significance for local students.

The potential for a modular building was discussed in detail. Board members emphasized the importance of aesthetics, noting that first impressions matter and that any new structure should present a positive image for the airport. There was agreement on the need for collaboration and ensuring new members are informed about ongoing discussions to avoid misunderstandings.

Economic development was another focal point, with acknowledgment of Mr. Nations’ contributions to the airport. The board debated the financial implications of the modular building, emphasizing the need to minimize financial strain on the airport by exploring funding options. Concerns were raised about potential revenue loss if the flight school relocated, impacting income from existing leases.

The board considered the feasibility of moving forward with the modular building project, taking into account budget constraints and the need for restroom facilities. A motion was made to recommend the city procure a modular system for the flight school, with the city manager determining lease terms and project specifics. The board stressed the importance of presenting a firm dollar figure to the city commission, as this would be a primary concern.