The proposal to install a splash pad at the riverfront sparked debate, with residents expressing both support and opposition. One resident strongly opposed the riverfront location. They emphasized that the riverfront already hosts numerous events, such as the Aelia Festival and fishing tournaments, making it a busy area that may not be suitable for additional recreational features. The resident also noted the presence of a county-operated splash pad and advocated for collaboration with county authorities to enhance that facility instead.

Conversely, another resident, Evette Jones, argued in favor of the splash pad, highlighting its potential to provide recreation, aesthetic appeal, and community engagement. Jones described the splash pad as a valuable addition that could serve as a focal point for families and increase foot traffic for local businesses. She acknowledged safety concerns but suggested that features like non-slip surfaces and regular maintenance could mitigate these risks.

Amid these differing perspectives, commissioners expressed a desire for a plan detailing the splash pad’s location, design, and associated costs. They underscored the importance of considering the surrounding environment to ensure the splash pad enhances the area rather than standing out as an isolated feature.

The commission also discussed the implications of existing contracts related to the riverfront area, particularly an agreement with Boat House Marina. Concerns were raised about how these agreements might impact the splash pad proposal, with commissioners emphasizing the need for better oversight to ensure city interests are effectively served.

In addition to the splash pad discussion, the commission addressed workers’ compensation issues affecting the city’s insurance premiums. The commission discussed strategies to manage and reduce claims, particularly focusing on safety training within the police department to mitigate risks and reduce costs that ultimately burden taxpayers.

Commissioners explored the severity of claims, with public works identified as having the second-highest number of injuries, highlighting the financial impact of substantial claims. The importance of reviews of claims to avoid unnecessary expenses was emphasized, alongside the need for proactive measures to improve workplace safety.

The meeting also included an introduction to the newly formed Neighborhood Improvement Team (NIT), a strategic initiative aimed at enhancing the quality of life in designated neighborhoods. The team, comprising various city departments and community stakeholders, aims to foster meaningful engagement and address disparities between high and low opportunity neighborhoods. The northern area of Palatka has been selected as the pilot neighborhood, with plans for a steering committee to guide the initiative’s development and assess community needs.

Another notable topic was the discussion on the city’s budget calendar and the presentation of the financial report for the seven months ending April 30, 2025. The financial report revealed actual revenues of $24 million and expenditures of $21 million, with concerns raised about potential impacts from state legislation that could eliminate ad valorem tax revenues. Commissioners acknowledged the need for proactive financial planning to address potential budgetary pressures.

The meeting concluded with a review of a proposed easement related to airspace above a city street. Concerns were raised about the legal description of the property and liability issues, leading to a decision to table the discussion until further clarification could be obtained.