The commission agreed on a millage rate of 6.2397 mills, consistent with the rollback rate, meaning property taxes would remain unchanged from the previous year. With a total final budget of $85,592,317, the finance director explained that the rollback millage rate is designed to keep tax revenue stable despite fluctuations in property values. However, the discussion revealed disparities in understanding among the commissioners, leading to a call for improved clarity in public communication.

Concerns were raised regarding the budget’s reliance on transferring funds from the better place fund to cover a deficit without affecting departmental budgets. A commissioner questioned the necessity of using other funds, arguing that if the budget mirrored last year’s, such transfers should be unnecessary.

A commissioner expressed frustration over the last-minute nature of the budget discussions, emphasizing the importance of timely communication and organized planning for future fiscal years. The call for a set schedule in advance of budget discussions was supported, with particular focus on enhancing public understanding of city, county, and school board taxes. It was suggested that local newspapers and the city website be utilized more effectively to disseminate clear and accurate information.

The need for educational outreach became apparent as one commissioner pointed out the confusion surrounding the millage rate and rollback rate. This confusion, it was noted, could extend to the wider community, who face multiple tax obligations. The importance of providing residents with thorough and accurate information was stressed, particularly in light of potential misinformation from limited news sources.

Further discussion centered on the budgeting process itself, with questions raised about the source of perceived savings. A commissioner sought clarification on the apparent discrepancy between expected outcomes and actual budget allocations, expressing the need for further education on the budget to align with the commission’s goals. The finance team was urged to explore creative solutions to optimize resources and find potential cuts or reallocations.

Public commentary added to the discourse, with resident Allegra Kitchens voicing gratitude for efforts towards tax relief while highlighting the financial struggles faced by those on fixed incomes. Kitchens advocated for a rollback rate to assist residents financially, criticizing the notion that such a rate would only offer minimal savings. Her suggestions for specific cuts to special events funding were aimed at freeing up resources for tax relief.

As the meeting concluded, the commission approved the final millage rate of 6.2397, lower than the previous year’s rate of 6.4, with a majority vote following further discussion on procedural matters. The meeting ended with a motion to adjourn, but not before a suggestion to include future budget discussions on upcoming agendas.