The most pressing case involved a property on Krill Avenue, owned by Olivia C. Tullk and Jeremy R. Tullk. Code enforcement officer Christy Low presented the case, revealing violations concerning mold and the need for a fresh coat of paint. Photographs illustrated the house’s condition. Jeremy Tullk participated in the hearing, expressing willingness to comply with city requirements to improve the property’s appearance. The magistrate ruled that Tullk must address the violations within 120 days, setting a deadline of June 18, 2025, and noting that fines would be imposed if compliance was not achieved by then.

Another case involved a property on Bronson Street, owned by Nancy M. Burke. This case centered on a violation of city code prohibiting the use of recreational equipment, such as campers, for living or sleeping. Code enforcement officer Low documented the case with photographs showing that Edward Murphy resided in a camper on the property. Burke explained that the complaint stemmed from a neighbor with whom her family had a contentious relationship, and she had applied for a variance due to space constraints in her home. The magistrate outlined a 120-day compliance period, with no immediate fines, allowing time for Burke to address the issue and work with city officials.

The meeting also covered a property on North 18th Street, owned by Mary Ward and Calvin Starling, which had several maintenance violations, including mold, trash accumulation, and excessive vegetation growth. Code enforcement officer Low presented photographic evidence of the property’s condition, highlighting significant mold on the structure and debris such as a stove and couch left outside. Despite attempts to contact the owners, no response was received, complicating efforts to resolve the violations.

Additionally, the magistrate reviewed a case involving a property on Laurel Street owned by Principal Partners Group LLC. The unsealed, burned structure had gaps allowing unauthorized access, and despite some cleanup efforts, debris remained. The magistrate discussed potential fines for non-compliance and the importance of securing the property to prevent hazards, particularly for children.