A primary focus of the meeting was Ordinance 20258, which proposed amendments to the borough code concerning alcoholic beverages. The ordinance aims to introduce penalties for consuming alcohol on non-licensed premises. This includes fines of $1,000 for a first offense, escalating to $5,000 for subsequent violations, and even imprisonment for up to 90 days. The amendment retains the existing rule that alcohol consumption must cease by midnight. During the discussion, clarification was sought on the differing regulations for establishments that allow alcohol consumption compared to those that serve it directly. A public participant voiced concerns about the hours of alcohol service, which currently allow for consumption from noon until midnight, and questioned how these rules apply to various establishments, such as pizzerias and restaurants.

Public comments highlighted confusion around the enforcement of public drinking laws, particularly regarding individuals consuming alcohol from paper bags on the street. A council member confirmed that public alcohol consumption remains illegal in New Jersey and promised consultation with the police department to clarify enforcement practices. The council’s deliberations underscored efforts to align the ordinance with previous measures aimed at reducing public intoxication through enhanced police enforcement.

Another topic discussed was the potential legalization of basement rentals. A resident proposed a systematic approach to legalize basement units, which could address safety concerns related to fire and building codes and increase property values, thereby boosting tax revenue for the borough. The resident highlighted safety hazards posed by illegal basement units lacking essential facilities like bathrooms, emphasizing the need for compliance with safety codes. The council acknowledged the need for a systematic sweep by code enforcers to ensure compliance and educate residents on the legal implications of illegal rentals.

Financial resolutions and project management issues also took center stage. The council reviewed claims, including expenses related to a sports shop and uniform construction code, and addressed concerns about payments owed for sewer operations in Richfield. Discussions revealed plans to enhance Columbus Park with grant funding, designating it as a pickable and dog park. Challenges arose regarding a demolition project, particularly concerning the removal of a basement and footings. The council debated whether to amend the existing resolution or provide additional funding, while a $6,700 credit from the contractor raised questions about its adequacy.

In addition, the council discussed the need for earlier snow removal at the library to accommodate staff arriving before 9:00 AM. Health-related concerns were raised, with a reminder for residents to exercise caution amid flu season. An update on a new borough website project, nearing completion by consultant U Do Young Kang, promised cost savings by allowing the council to manage edits in-house.

Public safety concerns were also addressed, with residents highlighting the absence of crossing guards at key intersections, posing risks to children. The council acknowledged the issue and outlined measures to prevent future shortages. Residents also called for improvements in street lighting, noting that existing fluorescent lights were inadequate. The Borough Administrator is reportedly working with PSEG to secure a grant for LED fixture replacements on streets identified as needing better illumination.