The most prominent topic of the meeting was the proposal to raise water and wastewater impact fees. Currently set at $500 for water and $1,400 for wastewater, the fees are proposed to increase to $1,000 and $2,000, respectively. This marks an overall rise from $1,900 to $3,000 for new construction. The council considered these increases necessary for maintaining competitiveness with neighboring municipalities. For instance, cities like Springfield and Callaway have similar fees, with Springfield charging approximately $966.86 for water and $1,277.88 for sewer, and Callaway at $1,020 and $1,735.

Central to the conversation was the city’s ability to set its own fees despite recommendations from a recent study by Forward Water, a consulting firm. The council determined that adopting the study’s recommendations was not mandatory, allowing for flexibility in setting fees. Concerns were voiced about nearby cities’ ability to manage infrastructure upgrades without sufficient impact fees.

Infrastructure deficiencies, particularly in the water system, were a critical focus. The council discussed a $7 million state revolving fund grant aimed at upgrading Parker’s water system, which faces issues like a lack of fire hydrants in some areas. This deficiency could have severe consequences in emergencies, such as the recent grass fires. Mayor Andrew Kelly emphasized the need for looping the water system to improve pressure and support development along Tindle Parkway. The project would start at Under the Oaks and involve renovations.

The discussions also touched on housing affordability, particularly in relation to the increased impact fees. Garrett Anderson, a local builder, addressed the implications, noting the challenge of affordability when additional costs raise monthly payments. The council acknowledged the vital role of infrastructure in supporting new housing developments, especially with the anticipated influx of residents near the Air Force base.

The council also emphasized the necessity of increasing housing capacity to accommodate military personnel relocating to Parker. The aim was to encourage them to settle in the city, contributing to the local economy, rather than seeking housing elsewhere. This led to discussions about utility ownership and financial arrangements, clarifying that Parker owns the pipe utility, while Bay County supplies water and manages sewer services.

Further discussions addressed the technicalities of impact fee calculations, which rely on a multiplier system based on the size of residential structures. Concerns were raised about consistency in the application of fees, particularly for larger homes or commercial properties. Melissa Strange, representing the Central Panhandle Association of Realtors, requested clarification on water and wastewater service capacity. She noted Parker’s significant remaining capacity, although it is limited by Bay County regulations.

Strange also proposed an exemption for affordable housing projects meeting state criteria, arguing this could assist low-income and military families in achieving homeownership. The council responded by highlighting the purpose of impact fees in covering the costs of providing services for new construction. They acknowledged the financial challenges faced by some military families, particularly those of lower ranks.

The meeting concluded with procedural notes. The next workshop was scheduled for the following Thursday, with updated ordinances to be made available on the city’s website. The implementation of any new fees would not take place for 90 days following approval.