The meeting’s most debated topic was an application to expand a driveway, which was met with public apprehension over water drainage. The applicants sought to alleviate storage constraints and drainage issues, presenting photographs and discussing efforts to mitigate water runoff to neighboring properties. Public concerns centered on the removal of trees and the potential obstruction of natural drainage paths. The board, limited to evaluating the specific variance request, approved the application with the condition that certain logs be removed to not exacerbate existing water issues.

Another application involved the construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling with an attached garage and open deck. The board grappled with the lot size and compliance with zoning ordinances before ultimately recommending a variance for the construction.

Further complicating the board’s agenda was a new application for a variance to legalize a third-story habitable space within a property with a history of appeals. The board expressed concerns about the property’s vacancy and potential use as a multifamily residence. After discussing the number of occupants and living arrangements, the board was assured of the applicant’s willingness to have the building department conduct necessary inspections for compliance.

A particularly sensitive discussion emerged over the use of an attic area in a house. Questions revolved around the number of kitchens, the presence of a bathroom, and the necessity of annual inspections. The board was wary of the potential for the attic to be used as a separate living space, which could lead to multifamily occupancy. Despite the applicant’s assurance of only one kitchen and the bathroom’s relevance to the living arrangements, the board remained skeptical.

Public comments also brought to light concerns over a proposed variance for a house on Pary Boulevard. A resident questioned the necessity of seven bathrooms and the potential for the dwelling to accommodate multiple families, leading to excessive parking and activity in the area. After a discussion, the board approved the variance, including a final inspection by the zoning inspector and a deed restriction to address these concerns.