The board’s most notable decision involved Urban Air Adventure Park, set to occupy a space in a local shopping center. The representatives sought variances for the sign’s square footage, height, and color. The proposed sign, with a total area of 288 square feet and a height of 30 feet 7 inches, exceeds local limits of 150 square feet and 25 feet, respectively. The applicant argued that the size was necessary for visibility due to the storefront’s setback in the shopping center, comparing it to signage for larger businesses like Home Depot and Marshalls.

The board also discussed the proposed neon green color, which deviates from the ordinance restricting bright colors to prevent emergency confusion. The applicant maintained that the neon green, a staple of Urban Air’s branding, would not compromise public safety. The board conducted a detailed review of the sign’s dimensions and aesthetics, and after thorough deliberation, members voted to approve the variances, noting the anticipated positive impact of the new business on the community.

Another topic was Application 252, where property owner Sudani Vadi sought to legalize unpermitted modifications made to his home to combat persistent flooding. Vadi explained that he had installed sidewalks, a gazebo, and a fence without permits, exceeding the allowed coverage area by 4.2%. He expressed willingness to comply with zoning and engineering recommendations, including implementing a dry well to address drainage issues. The board discussed Vadi’s awareness of local regulations and the impact on neighboring properties, ultimately proposing a motion to grant a C variance conditional on adherence to engineering solutions for drainage.

The meeting also included discussions on Application 2511 by Angeline Lopez, who sought a variance to build a new two-story single-family dwelling on Hayawa Boulevard. The application highlighted the need for better stormwater management, a recurring theme throughout the meeting. Board members emphasized the importance of consulting the township engineer, advising the applicants to gather necessary drainage details before proceeding. The application was carried to a future date to allow time for this consultation.

Further discussions addressed Application 2327 by 328 Kingston LLC, seeking a D variance to expand a two-family residence into a three-family dwelling. The proposal raised questions about parking adequacy, as the plan included only four spaces for six bedrooms across three units. The board stressed the need for compliance with parking regulations and proper stormwater management, reflecting ongoing community concerns about flooding and parking challenges.