56:50The project’s phased approach is designed to keep the business operational throughout the construction process, which is expected to last three to five years. The plan includes demolishing a residential building on the property and reconfiguring existing driveways to better manage truck traffic and minimize impacts on nearby homes. The board members underscored the importance of ensuring that the site’s redevelopment adheres to zoning regulations while addressing community concerns about traffic, noise, and visual impact. The project’s engineer outlined the plans, which include shifting driveways and creating a one-way traffic system to aid circulation and mitigate congestion.

1:51:15A significant topic of discussion was the project’s implications for traffic and parking logistics. The proposed plan outlines 27 car parking spaces, with designations for customer and employee use, and 69 truck parking spaces, categorized for customer, inventory, and servicing needs. The board emphasized the necessity for clear delineation of parking spaces to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and to manage electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. Concerns were raised about the absence of designated handicap parking for truck customers, with a call for a detailed summary table to clarify parking allocations and ensure compliance with zoning ordinances.

Signage and lighting were also debated extensively. The proposed plan includes four signs, all of which exceed the ordinance’s maximum mounting height of 25 feet, with discussions on potentially lowering them to align with regulations. The board considered the impact of illuminated signage on neighboring residents. Lighting for the parking lot was proposed at 18 feet, with measures to reduce glare on nearby homes, and the use of motion detectors for security lighting was explored to balance security needs with neighbor concerns.

38:51In addition to the truck service facility, the board considered the application for a variance related to the construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling on Hy Road. Applicant Kamal Malik plans for the home, emphasizing its compliance with neighborhood aesthetics and zoning requirements. The board noted that the existing basketball court on the property contributed to excessive impervious coverage and discussed the removal of the court to alleviate coverage issues. Malik confirmed compliance with front yard setbacks, although a member pointed out a potential oversight regarding the front porch overhang. The board moved to recommend granting the variance, contingent on adherence to engineering recommendations for drainage.

21:17Another application involved Dave and Tess Lewis, who sought to legalize various structures on Battle Ridge Road, including a basketball court, shed, and patio. The board highlighted the need for a licensed professional to develop a formal drainage plan to address runoff concerns raised by neighbors. The applicants were encouraged to consult with a licensed landscape architect to design a solution that would be reviewed by the township’s engineering department. The board agreed to carry the application forward, stipulating that any plans must be submitted ten days in advance of future discussions.

38:51The meeting also touched on the application for a variance to construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on Hy Road. The board expressed concerns about impervious coverage related to an existing basketball court, with discussions about planting a berm to manage coverage issues. Kamal Malik, the applicant, explained the plans to construct a two-story colonial house, noting compliance with neighborhood character and zoning regulations. Questions about stormwater management were raised, with Malik confirming adherence to engineering recommendations. The board moved to recommend granting the variance, including agreement on drainage compliance.