The most compelling discussion centered around application 2413 submitted by J M Incorporated for a preliminary and final major site plan on Green Hill Road. The applicant proposed modifications to an earlier plan, including reducing the building size to allow more outdoor recreational space and moving the structure closer to the road. This adjustment was accompanied by a reduction in the building’s size from 40 by 90 feet to 40 by 75 feet, creating additional green space and allowing for a buffer zone with added benches and landscaping. The board emphasized the importance of ensuring that these changes did not negatively impact the neighborhood’s character or violate zoning requirements.

Board members expressed concerns about the proposed changes, particularly regarding the parking arrangements, signage, and accessibility features of the site. The plan included provisions for 22 parking spaces, which exceeded the ordinance requirement of 19 spaces, and two electric vehicle charging stations, surpassing the mandated one spot. However, issues arose with the sidewalk design, which had to accommodate a slope of 6-7%, thus requiring a ramp with handrails to comply with accessibility standards.

The architectural plans faced scrutiny over the elimination of a bump-out feature and the resulting need for a setback variance, which would reduce the required distance from the road from 50 feet to 40 feet. The design adjustments aimed to preserve the aesthetic continuity of the building facade despite these structural changes. The architect assured the board that the trim and overall appearance would remain consistent, even with the modifications.

Furthermore, the placement and visibility of the building’s signage were addressed, with the proposal including four signs for the three retail tenants and an additional sign for the rear entrance. The board stressed the need for the signage to adhere to the area’s maximum requirements while ensuring visibility for each tenant.

The drainage plan was another focal point, particularly concerning the HVAC units being relocated to the roof. The architect confirmed that a solid guard rail would be installed to deflect sound upwards, adhering to engineering recommendations. The drainage from the HVAC area would lead to a gutter system connected to downspouts, emptying into the drywell system to manage water flow effectively.

The board also examined application 2464 concerning a detached three-car garage on South Beverly Road. The applicant, who had been in the district since 1972, sought to construct a garage matching the architectural integrity of their historically restored home built in 1900. The garage, which would have only electric utilities to support future electric vehicle charging, was designed to include a round top detail replicating an attic feature of the house. The proposal involved removing an old shed to make space for the new structure.

Board members unanimously approved the application, recognizing the importance of preserving the historical character of the property. The applicant assured that the new garage would not affect the existing impervious coverage calculations, even with plans to replace the gravel driveway with pavers or bricks.

In addition to these applications, the board addressed the proposed Islamic Community Cultural Center application, scheduled for review in April, and considered the dismissal of application 2455 for failure to appear. The board also discussed application 2468 for a variance request by Yaln Nasi to construct a new single-family dwelling on Minihaha Boulevard. Testimonies highlighted the need for variances related to front yard setbacks and building coverage, with assurances that the design would harmonize with the neighborhood’s character.