The most notable discussion focused on the city’s application for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the 2023-2024 program year. Andy Easton, representing Andy Easton and Associates, outlined the application process, emphasizing the importance of community input and the completion of a door-to-door income survey to establish eligibility. Easton noted that the grant application would focus on neighborhood revitalization, housing improvements, and the construction of a new fire station, which emerged as a key priority from the recent Citizen Advisory Task Force meeting.

Concerns about Perry’s ability to attract new businesses due to the presence of dilapidated structures were also addressed. The task force stressed the importance of enhancing the town’s appearance to improve its business prospects. Additionally, discussions revealed that a unique grant application cycle could allow Perry to apply for up to six million dollars without an upper limit, although the competitive nature of the grant process was acknowledged.

Discussions extended to the potential use of CDBG funds for economic development projects, such as business signage improvements and the rehabilitation of structures. Easton confirmed that such activities could be funded under the economic development category, sharing examples of other municipalities that have revitalized historic buildings for commercial use. He emphasized the importance of aligning project proposals with likely funding opportunities, considering the competitive nature of the grants.

Another notable topic was the presentation by Natalie from the Small Business Administration, who introduced the Disaster Assistance Program designed to support businesses, homeowners, renters, and nonprofits affected by disasters. This was particularly relevant in the aftermath of Hurricane Hel, as she detailed the program’s physical disaster loans, economic injury disaster loans, and home disaster assistance. Deadlines for applications were set for April 27, 2025, for physical damage loans and June 30 for economic injury loans. The council encouraged further dissemination of this information to maximize community benefit.

The council also addressed an ordinance concerning the disposal of dental amalgam in wastewater, prompted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) requirements. Although no current compliance issues were identified, the council recognized the necessity of updating the ordinance, which had last been amended in 2012. Discussion included whether new dental practices would need to install traps to collect amalgam waste.

In terms of community aesthetics, the council evaluated proposals for new city entrance signs. A budget of approximately $650 was mentioned for a design, which would be credited back if the city awarded the construction contract to the company. Feedback on previous sign designs was mixed, with some members expressing dissatisfaction and suggesting enhancements, such as incorporating the word “welcome” above the city name. The cost estimates for sign implementation varied based on design complexity and potential digital features.

Further discussions included incentives for businesses to repair or replace their signage, with a proposal to send a letter to local businesses outlining contractor options. The possibility of waiving permit fees for disaster-related repairs was considered, although it was noted that such fees are managed by the county, requiring further discussion with county officials.

The council also deliberated on the transition to a new billing system, with April postcard bills being the last of their kind before shifting to a comprehensive bill format covering water, gas, sewer, and garbage services. Concerns about downtime for payment processing during the transition were addressed, with assurances that payments would continue under the old system until the launch of the new one.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on wastewater management, addressing new DEP requirements for nutrient uptake standards. The city faced decisions on whether to invest in equipment for self-harvesting or contract out services for compliance. The financial implications of stricter DEP limits on phosphorus and nitrogen were noted, highlighting the city’s challenges in adapting to regulatory changes.