The council’s most notable action was the approval of the final reading of ordinance 1051, which amends wastewater regulations to include dental amalgam. This amendment aims to enhance environmental safeguards by regulating the disposal of materials that could potentially harm the water system. The ordinance was adopted without objections, underscoring its importance in maintaining the city’s wastewater standards.

Another point of discussion was the proposed budget amendments. Resolution 2025-11 addressed a shortfall in funds for building demolitions, necessitating a notable budget adjustment that involved transferring $18 from the water fund. This adjustment is vital for carrying out the demolition of unsafe structures, as approved by the city’s board of adjustments. The council also approved resolution 2025-12, which involved reallocating budgetary funds to transition the police chief’s retirement plan from a pension to a 457 plan.

Resolution 2025-13 involved amendments to the community redevelopment fund. The council discussed unforeseen expenses that required recalibration of the budget to mirror actual expenditures accurately. This resolution is part of the city’s ongoing efforts to maintain financial stability while addressing community needs.

On a related note, the council discussed operational challenges within the water and fire departments. The water department has been facing difficulties with fund management, but new systems have been implemented to prevent overspending. A member highlighted the effectiveness of these measures, noting that they enable better financial oversight without exceeding budget limits. Meanwhile, the fire department has revamped its flushing operations, a move expected to boost the city’s ISO ratings. These operations were communicated to the public through local newspapers and social media.

In the realm of infrastructure, the council addressed issues with culverts and vegetation management. Concerns were raised about clogged culverts at specific locations, which could lead to drainage problems if not inspected and maintained. Additionally, the presence of dead trees near city lights on Plantation Road was discussed, with estimates for removal ranging from $15,000 to $18,000. These concerns emphasize the need for ongoing maintenance to prevent safety hazards and preserve public spaces.

Further discussions centered on the challenges faced by the fire department in managing lift stations, particularly the one referred to as Goodman’s. This station has been plagued by grease buildup and unusual debris, such as ketchup packets and socks, primarily due to nearby restaurants. The council recognized the need for better equipment to manage these issues effectively, noting the financial implications of acquiring new trucks, with costs estimated at $550,000 for a larger vehicle and $400,000 for a non-CDL model.

The council also explored potential funding for a storefront facade and signage rehabilitation program, aimed at revitalizing the downtown area. Described as a “dream grant on steroids,” this initiative is part of the city’s broader efforts to enhance economic opportunities and improve the aesthetic appeal of Perry’s commercial districts.

Finally, the council considered a fiscal year 24 51% letter related to a county direct grant for the sheriff’s office, which requires council approval for the mayor’s signature. The grant stipulates that funds will be allocated for investigative purposes.