Clark highlighted several specific issues with the proposed ordinance. He pointed out that much of the language was directly lifted from the Perth Amboy rent control ordinance, even citing a section that mistakenly referenced Perth Amboy instead of Phillipsburg. Clark raised questions about the comparability of Perth Amboy to Phillipsburg, citing differences in population, median household income, and the proportion of renters.

The councilman also addressed potential financial implications, such as the costs associated with the establishment and operation of a rent stabilization board, which would be taxpayer-funded. He noted that legal oversight would be necessary due to the board’s power to issue subpoenas, which would lead to further government spending.

Clark was particularly critical of the hardship clause in the ordinance, which would limit landlords to a 3% annual rent increase unless they could demonstrate that their expenditures exceeded 60% of their total rental income. He argued that such a stipulation was bad for business and could drive investors to sell their properties, possibly resulting in neglected or poorly maintained rental units.

Throughout his remarks, Councilman Clark emphasized the need to address the root causes of housing issues, such as the statewide and national shortage of housing, rather than just the symptoms. He suggested that the town should focus on increasing the supply of housing and utilizing state resources for renter assistance, such as the mentioned “yanker program.”

The councilman concluded his remarks by stating he would not vote for the ordinance, citing concerns about its long-term effects on the community. He advocated for solutions that would not penalize homeowners, businesses, or renters in the long run.